Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:51:54 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 067Hh79j027285; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:43:12 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 067Hh6wI027278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:43:06 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 067HilJ4018141 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:44:53 -0400 Received: from w92expo27.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.33) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:42:06 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92expo27.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:42:57 -0400 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.171) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:42:56 -0400 Received: from CO1PR15CA0107.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:101:21::27) by CY4PR01MB2583.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:70::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.28; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:42:55 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT051.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:101:21:cafe::fc) by CO1PR15CA0107.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:101:21::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:42:55 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (209.85.128.53) by CO1NAM03FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:42:55 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id o8so44220841wmh.4 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:42:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Denny Esterline To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:42:38 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] DIN mount Arduino (or similar) with 24V digital IO? Thread-Topic: [EE] DIN mount Arduino (or similar) with 24V digital IO? Thread-Index: AdZUh02sWw8aPhZ9Q1ifbevpxmluCg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.128.53 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.128.53; helo=mail-wm1-f53.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nJobl9mCqS1jztKSdTY015Efe9vmpPZi+5O4tMGjV9A=; b=Cp0nLNy71NIhPbTOv4VFIHPSOzH45ObRVpLq/O+0FhjlXcFOXFHRyVlD5OOmw8B/6L 3SYIv7OBAAU3cCuKJIIn+yerHpxjwkJdlE8vrFp5f7fNH1TnSzdvIjGqsU916u+kaj7V u60VDC7mDvpPDliv4It3/HX76ghxvKu/MFLncVMkJqydIiTs5OJ8AssUZKilDlsTZasQ GvL+DlipEWeMjkp911oM5bBF6g8mLF5/I+poCe0usNNcKUHDsuNhc3vs7BRtor1B+GJr OrDc5NTsTVSUno5fOSm7TYf2+kRyvaCiZFCSpJ0d1QLOW7OyDg28lWjzD/oUnhC/KYqB JhUQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.128.53) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:600c:2182:: with SMTP id e2mr5219372wme.186.1594143773024; Tue, 07 Jul 2020 10:42:53 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Many options exist and a quick google will net several to choose from. Here's one I just tripped on: https://circuitdigest.com/tutorial/an-overview-of-plc-and-various-arduino-p= lc-boards To me, it's a bit of a mess and the choice to make is based on economics of development time and long term support rather than purchase price. There's a fairly large existing support base for real PLCs in industrial settings. Arduino... not so much. On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:15 AM Jason White < whitewaterssoftwareinfo@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a one-off personal automation project that I have been sitting on > for a few years - an air compressor controller, consisting of a 240V > contactor, two air solenoids, and a few buttons/lights in a box. > > I was wondering if anyone knew of any cheap DIN rail mounted Arduino (or > similar devices) with 24V digital IO? > > I am familiar with the Click PLC being about $70 plus the cost of a > programming cable ($20). Being an EE and embedded programmer I know > arduinos can be bought dirt cheap and are "reasonable" for simple persona= l > projects like mine. For ruggedness, I am hoping to find an enclosure and/= or > possibly a special purpose arduino-like PCB that has IO built in already. > > -- > Jason White > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .