Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:13:59 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 062K2i7q021629; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:02:55 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 062K2hhV021626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:02:43 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 062K2c2e022305 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:02:39 -0400 Received: from w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:01:43 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:02:25 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.168) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:02:25 -0400 Received: from MWHPR01CA0032.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) by BY5PR01MB5956.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:1b9::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.20; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 20:02:23 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT062.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:101:cafe::b) by MWHPR01CA0032.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 20:02:23 +0000 Received: from cmta18.telus.net (209.171.16.91) by CO1NAM03FT062.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 20:02:22 +0000 Received: from DAR5.planet.eon.net ([142.59.122.93]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id r5PXjozqYMrGrr5PZjlBb9; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 14:02:21 -0600 From: Dwayne Reid To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:02:19 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Specifying the right electrolytic capacitors for long (10 year) operating life? Thread-Topic: [EE] Specifying the right electrolytic capacitors for long (10 year) operating life? Thread-Index: AdZQrVKMv2qNJS8ITt6Jyyc0nIpmdg== Message-ID: <3a880f7aeabb3600b2925c7dd3f2e7eb@mtlp000085> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of planet.eon.net designates 209.171.16.91 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.171.16.91; helo=cmta18.telus.net; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitprod.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-mitprod-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cVwmfiz6p0H3IbQlIKp35iob2YTqABl96U93ZDg/5FQ=; b=RfwNqbpeNjKMV0IvaD6mjM/f+DIb/CgtPJkpGCD2bs1MZjv7e8w4zi1omrw/WHZxdJptLVUPXl6tfVrTsfAMnHk7OxRqqv7La+P8QmDIMZFK0BFC215WMJJQvY/4bA28RiAq784DumTQc2p2U14nQfOBmi5kHVYonAJsAF9MDis= authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.171.16.91) smtp.mailfrom=planet.eon.net; mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=planet.eon.net; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-authority-analysis: v=2.3 cv=A+ASwJeG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Dd/bvHhForHuZnb7ytaWSQ==:117 a=Dd/bvHhForHuZnb7ytaWSQ==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=F07sB3KiAAAA:8 a=Gz7s5_CCAAAA:8 a=D1QUtfyEAAAA:8 a=WVHiL177AAAA:8 a=1alZ_kbrw2wfBMJZTKoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=iZdX4GlK_F8A:10 a=SxPZiMLqSpAA:10 a=n1uYnq2louoA:10 a=8rYrM0obaTRgCqsvCuYq:22 a=_yt5nuqSr3Ff_nZNByN4:22 a=zz8lhgAq7brTZQd0Oeqi:22 x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi there, Jason. I use Tantalum capacitors for RC time delays. Good quality=20 electrolytic caps might give you good results - or not. Both bead-type and hermetically-sealed Tantalum caps have been=20 reliable for me for decades. I do not have reliability data for SMT=20 Tantalum caps - I just haven't been using them long enough. However, do NOT ever use a Tantalum cap on a high-current power=20 rail. They fail if exposed to even a momentary over-voltage=20 transient. The end result is often a hole in the PCB where the=20 capacitor used to be. dwayne At 10:38 AM 7/2/2020, Jason White wrote: >Hi everyone, > >I'm looking to learn about the critical parameters in specifying the >"correct" electrolytic capacitor to last a long time (10 years). > >I suspect it comes down to selecting a "long life" series capacitor from a >reputable brand (perhaps Nichicon or Panasonic?) with a high hour and >temperature rating, low ESR, and significantly higher than needed voltage >rating. > >I have a safety related circuit where I have no choice but to use two >"large value" electrolytic capacitors. Wide temperature range, very loose >tolerance and performance expectations from the capacitors. I'd like the >two capacitors to "last" 10 years of having power applied. > >The first capacitor is being used in a RC timing delay. Consequently, the >"ripple" current would be in the single digit microamp range. I'm concerne= d >about this capacitor's capacitance and leakage staying in spec over >temperature and time. Low duty cycle. > >The second capacitor is being used to provide bulk "high-ish voltage" >decoupling capacitance to an electric motor. The supply impedance to the >motor rail is high. I'm concerned about this capacitor's ESR and >capacitance staying in spec over temperature and time. Ripple current is >assumed to be similar to motor supply current of ~3 amps. Low duty cycle. > >Tambient-max=3D95C > >Any advice, anecdotes, or links to relevant literature would be appreciate= d. > >-- >Jason White >-- >http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >View/change your membership options at >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 Dwayne Reid Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA 780-489-3199 voice 780-487-6397 fax 888-489-3199 Toll Free www.trinity-electronics.com Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .