Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:09:33 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 062Gw0fW027915; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:58:35 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 062GvwQN027912 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:57:58 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 062GvQZ2011219 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:57:55 -0400 Received: from oc11expo33.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.114) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:57:33 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11expo33.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.114) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:57:46 -0400 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.105) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:57:46 -0400 Received: from MWHPR22CA0058.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:12a::20) by DM5PR01MB3290.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:3:f7::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.23; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT014.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:12a:cafe::47) by MWHPR22CA0058.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:12a::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (209.85.208.42) by CO1NAM03FT014.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3153.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:57:45 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id e15so24739196edr.2 for ; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a50:3ad4:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:57:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason White To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 09:57:42 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Specifying the right electrolytic capacitors for long (10 year) operating life? Thread-Topic: [EE] Specifying the right electrolytic capacitors for long (10 year) operating life? Thread-Index: AdZQk471eD66IMGtRXeleCkqLF+ANA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.42 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.42; helo=mail-ed1-f42.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RTrKJUP/z60WioT1XkK3xTmTQ7A+N6TAshhPEeNldOM=; b=Rb0QhhDXTZLAoR4Ztd70a2s1gHRAusWrsFSDVEpaW4akNCWQB422W/KJoWQOPHib6H ft+rSxz8yqLQJCnWRV0Wn1ow/u763OBfMVFQbcgupL1mTYpl/NCqfSGPFborPbV+WVQ6 mhq0jtZ3dhSt/r0SFtDybgGs/Z3vPzOXvjmLr2NtaCnsOJ3eAIi1QRiWWi3x75BbFjC8 iCYCCE4A8/5KlYNzxqQZibf7Ihnql8VpuvlBcy57zUJQSVYCfw7vMLN2EnZErUzhw2aB cAolW68b8yDl6YRnW8piSE9dKWDG2/BF/Zp5q8pW5xtpKLeItyz3+KTUtXyGdvsNFQZ1 1pPQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.42) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aa7:c885:: with SMTP id p5mr21258805eds.100.1593709063414; Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:57:43 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Addendum, by low duty cycle I mean about 5 seconds of activity per hour for the motor and timing capacitor. The capacitors will spend most of their life exposed to something like the following: power applied for 1 hour with 5 seconds of operation somewhere during, 1 hour with power removed. That cycle would be repeated something like 88000 times to get 10 years of power applied. On Thursday, July 2, 2020, Jason White wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm looking to learn about the critical parameters in specifying the > "correct" electrolytic capacitor to last a long time (10 years). > > I suspect it comes down to selecting a "long life" series capacitor from = a > reputable brand (perhaps Nichicon or Panasonic?) with a high hour and > temperature rating, low ESR, and significantly higher than needed voltage > rating. > > I have a safety related circuit where I have no choice but to use two > "large value" electrolytic capacitors. Wide temperature range, very loose > tolerance and performance expectations from the capacitors. I'd like the > two capacitors to "last" 10 years of having power applied. > > The first capacitor is being used in a RC timing delay. Consequently, the > "ripple" current would be in the single digit microamp range. I'm concern= ed > about this capacitor's capacitance and leakage staying in spec over > temperature and time. Low duty cycle. > > The second capacitor is being used to provide bulk "high-ish voltage" > decoupling capacitance to an electric motor. The supply impedance to the > motor rail is high. I'm concerned about this capacitor's ESR and > capacitance staying in spec over temperature and time. Ripple current is > assumed to be similar to motor supply current of ~3 amps. Low duty cycle. > > Tambient-max=3D95C > > Any advice, anecdotes, or links to relevant literature would be > appreciated. > > -- > Jason White > --=20 Jason White --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .