Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:58:54 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 05TFmCvI020855; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:48:52 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 05TFmAuJ020852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:48:11 -0400 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 05TFncPE001197 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:49:51 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:47:44 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by w92exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:48:05 -0400 Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.44.54) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:48:05 -0400 Received: from MWHPR2201CA0038.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:16::12) by BYAPR01MB4182.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:57::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:48:03 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT050.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:16:cafe::c2) by MWHPR2201CA0038.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:301:16::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.21 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:48:03 +0000 Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.107.237.101) by CO1NAM03FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.20 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:48:02 +0000 Received: from CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:6d::17) by CY4PR01MB3302.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:903:e9::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3131.25; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:48:00 +0000 Received: from CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::a496:322:ae51:d551]) by CY4PR01MB2407.prod.exchangelabs.com ([fe80::a496:322:ae51:d551%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3131.027; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:48:00 +0000 From: David Van Horn To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:48:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Thread-Topic: [EE] Thread-Index: AQHWTZg5YlzPA84rSkmMCbP4cAMbdKjunGeAgAAF2gCAARvIkg== Message-ID: References: , List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of backcountryaccess.com designates 40.107.237.101 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.107.237.101; helo=NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=k2mdv.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-k2mdv-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qp3+WSBx8oATItbjqGeWYOzsowQxAayX21pq2j7Bf6k=; b=CK+h/Vk9LK1sn3QMuEvuHvDBj0a4oU/UAWVWyMiqV+/PjQre5the+Rd5bhR5qgOG62srHPuPyeafFmMRUlY9rxWkcGCppVvouNNA51Y91+TKgQpBiQ0ZxP/tlCA47AzdS66Co+jns09IjN5osEVA7P9W5NDf5WJcnpZkQt0QKhk= authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.107.237.101) smtp.mailfrom=backcountryaccess.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=k2mdv.onmicrosoft.com; mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=backcountryaccess.com; x-originating-ip: [67.172.157.116] errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Yup. Manhattan style is probably better than perfboard here. ________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Harold= Hallikainen Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 4:51 PM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [EE] High currents and "sharp edges" make minor inductances significant. I'd be tempted to use a protoboard with a solid ground plane and some adhesive backed copper strap for the fast high current portions of the circuit. Harold > Absolutely! The key is planning out the component placement and signal > routing. As long as the design (schematic, etc.) is good, a hand-wired > circuit operating at 10s or even 100s of kHz on perfboard is perfectly > reasonable. > > In the amateur radio community its common to see this style of > construction > up into the 10MHz range. > > On Sunday, June 28, 2020, madscientistatlarge < > madscientistatlarge@protonmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it at all reasonable to build a switching power supply on a perf >> board? I plan to use heavy gauge wire and properly fix the location of >> all >> components. This would be a variable (digital programming) buck >> converter. Current will be about 10A max, usually less. Output noise >> and >> somewhat poor regulation are acceptable to me in this case. Obviously >> I'd >> also be running it at 10's of kilohertz as well to mitigate some of the >> concerns. Is it reasonable if I use a proto-board with a ground plane? >> I >> know this is usually somewhat problematic. Thanks. >> >> >> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > > > -- > Jason White > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com Not sent from an iPhone. -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .