Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:31:41 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04MFNZpT028550; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:23:47 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04MFNYSc028541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:23:34 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 04MFOVld013983 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:24:43 -0400 Received: from w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:23:14 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:23:21 -0400 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.45.51) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:23:21 -0400 Received: from CO1PR15CA0093.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:101:21::13) by BL0PR01MB5025.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:2e::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.24; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:23:19 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT010.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:101:21:cafe::a4) by CO1PR15CA0093.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:101:21::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:23:19 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (209.85.166.46) by CO1NAM03FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:23:19 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id r145so9368603iod.12 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:23:19 -0700 (PDT) From: David VanHorn To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 08:23:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Light bulb moment (literally) Thread-Topic: [EE] Light bulb moment (literally) Thread-Index: AdYwThfDSh3FX9O7R9uaAbhNIvAvMQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.166.46 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.166.46; helo=mail-io1-f46.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e4t0Z21I7uGTaRJH81qVkE1eiSawN9QgtxqOtnEZCJY=; b=ePWCsQpOFue+0ERbk9tLopR9ABqpoDu+T8elFvMsln3RItNng5x9krrENT1nuFgrg4 4I20Anof00CWaOkIhdADfY4w3BjhBNmj/R7BXBYbU7SlbACKdicOhrMkCq99Q1U9Sjtn NKuKQVJxmrskoJ12KGhzslcrox9IyttGuYoGse1ENxCeDWNYQscDkUcv5jtF4Jo2yIe/ O79GBOhBhcdFDbIsfZOgpkADv6Okv0kDPYxqA8FpPoNHBi/k6x8ZSAfbJO/O2Yxt3pnt wfj4H8GyE2WflLMxyWrvdQfdB34VNlJSbKEdxs3r77ybZ1vQ8L3PNMnPrMU5IO8OfMIO r4Eg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.166.46) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a02:6d46:: with SMTP id e6mr222308jaf.43.1590160997124; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:23:17 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 My first bike had a combination bulb and fluorescent light. 6: tube. The generator had the usual 6V output for the bulb and 100V for the tube. Never seen one like that since. This was around 1967 or 68 On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:19 AM Chris McSweeny wrote= : > It is, except that the maximum voltage is speed dependent. It is (was?) a > common modification to use one to supply 12V across two lights in series, > but with a switch to short out one of the lights at lower speeds where th= e > dynamo can't supply 12V. > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:34 AM David C Brown wrote: > > > I have just realised that the traditional "dynamo" used for bicycle > > lighting (and which is really) a magneto) is, despite being sold as a 6 > > volt machine, a actually a constant current device. > > Since both voltage and frequency - hence reactance - rise > > approximately linearly with speed the current remains constant. > > __________________________________________ > > David C Brown > > 43 Bings Road > > Whaley Bridge > > High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > > Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > > SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > > > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .