Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:28:19 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04MFI81A027404; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:18:43 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04MFI7gf027401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:18:07 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 04MFHKKl015523 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:17:22 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:17:34 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:17:49 -0400 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.104) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:17:49 -0400 Received: from DM5PR07CA0060.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:ad::25) by SN6PR01MB4957.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:bc::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.26; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:17:48 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT013.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:ad:cafe::8) by DM5PR07CA0060.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:ad::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:17:47 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (209.85.218.52) by DM3NAM03FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 May 2020 15:17:47 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id j21so13483510ejy.1 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:17:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris McSweeny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 08:17:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Light bulb moment (literally) Thread-Topic: [EE] Light bulb moment (literally) Thread-Index: AdYwTZ/b9F+le1moRcmWg4fyeXOOjg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.52 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.52; helo=mail-ej1-f52.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=A57bFgvze/VRrKQWGUup2rZLAqmVKg76ASPCcYY6xm0=; b=kbBTKyIYXKy1BSl7Mw9F4KQ7EBnc15gMSyX3+Uy2vxTxsCSJ064t/s6u1FVoOQvYsT C2GAbZLJt7TgQohohrr4SU7SdfD/AnBUVxfdY5HEdYdbFXuYWPopiAQmq4UlRXzbkCJx +sCfYSx816tjbfsDgC76/KAb0C9a7nBtxugHUFrcvSZtOszcAK0qtHtnZ9kHn6AtuPV8 hsTCf0V72ehW30MmzwT7S7pfNezAVZCUWjzW3lwx4itk4xs7j42bjLcHPUXUfq5j4tY7 rEnVKo2s49pAQrYBcJ/mIdyXs8Gbhk1AvLkF+L/clRyUic58cME3Wm3c8yukEPxw9Lyp dGhg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.52) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:9157:: with SMTP id y23mr9048392ejw.0.1590160665920; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 It is, except that the maximum voltage is speed dependent. It is (was?) a common modification to use one to supply 12V across two lights in series, but with a switch to short out one of the lights at lower speeds where the dynamo can't supply 12V. On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:34 AM David C Brown wrote: > I have just realised that the traditional "dynamo" used for bicycle > lighting (and which is really) a magneto) is, despite being sold as a 6 > volt machine, a actually a constant current device. > Since both voltage and frequency - hence reactance - rise > approximately linearly with speed the current remains constant. > __________________________________________ > David C Brown > 43 Bings Road > Whaley Bridge > High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .