Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 9 May 2020 10:06:20 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 049GuVju027829; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:56:49 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 049GuUEI027825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:56:30 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 049Gtijq010552 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:55:54 -0400 Received: from w92expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.62) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:55:22 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:56:05 -0400 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.109) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:56:05 -0400 Received: from DM6PR02CA0057.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:177::34) by DM6PR01MB5801.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:5:200::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.29; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:56:05 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT043.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:177:cafe::aa) by DM6PR02CA0057.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:177::34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.28 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:56:04 +0000 Received: from premium47-4.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.244) by DM3NAM03FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.27 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:56:04 +0000 Received: from 072-238-001-037.res.spectrum.com ([72.238.1.37]:52424 helo=[192.168.10.107]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jXSlb-002HSF-2x; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:56:03 -0400 From: Neil To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 09:55:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Pick & Place Thread-Topic: [EE] Pick & Place Thread-Index: AdYmJCnE2qSH076qTi2jiIh891pORQ== Message-ID: <5EB6E09D.5040606@narwani.org> References: <1097603349.116654.1589034339442@mail.yahoo.com> <5EB6D3F9.4030307@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EN1cHpFZDzOC6irXMCrj9x/4M6/A58DJ6CesZPOrNLs=; b=UvjHaSxUXH2Zd+5ZtTkXgQDR20 3zMw0VosDUhPYNiVy4+OAa0jGWIOwBOZ/+nEXL8NuQ6SSkPerVdD066Pk4tASBTPatNRZtR9nZvry /VCkU7xMePvsqYFj1342Qv0V1l8Pc2fXXnt77KnTGYq+EG7MPRyDRLFWxhOPMaEjHY6wa4xSVbev2 bVDGMRhEIXox0dmx6XsY9gJc6AaKVgIk8Bacnbo/pYgWNxcV2xrvi3tEZEikG13iZ9I1/NoXyphPJ 7r3AKY2jjltwWFKqDyHMQPNVWUf6O3NV2lrjatlJnn8YRj91Z/hB5ghC44NgJXdUhspPLtOkBqlPm f6xeuAeQ==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.244) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org;compauth=pass reason=109 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Yes, used machines are less than appealing where you are. If you have the budget for one of those free-standing machines, then=20 sure. I was just suggesting that even those desktop-sized Neoden-type=20 machines will be much more than sufficient for just 20 boards a day=20 (though not sure how many parts are on your boards). Most of these machines claim at least 2k parts per hour. That's ideal=20 and depends on where the feeders and component pads are located. Say=20 1000 cph is realistic. At say 50 parts per board, that's 20 boards in=20 one hour. Cheers, -Neil. On 5/9/2020 12:18 PM, Isaac M. Bavaresco wrote: > Neil, > > > The US$20K is for the machine alone, plus 10K for import duties. I could > spend some more on feeders. > > All the machines I mentioned fall in this price range. > > The oven I can buy here in Brazil for just over US$1K. > > > I'm not buying an used machine. Other companies around us did it and are > always in trouble with lack of parts, high cost of parts and also > control software that only run on ancient OSs, etc. > > > The desktop machines are not enough for me. I need something slightly > bigger, like these: > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Isaac > > > Em 09/05/2020 13:02, Neil escreveu: >> Isaac, >> >> Few more random notes... >> >> Is this the budget for the whole line, or just the PnP? Also, I'm not >> sure how much of your budget will go to import duties etc, but let's say >> you have US$20k for the price of the machine(s). That can get you a >> lot, especially if all you want to do is 20 boards a day. This was my >> quandry also -- I wanted low volume/low speed, but with the ability to >> 0603's and even 0402's. Older machines (lower cost) wouldn't guarantee >> they'd do 0603's reliably, but were slower. Newer machines could do >> 0603's reliably, but they seemed to focus on high-speed/volume and the >> price went up significantly for that. >> >> Personally, with that budget, I'd look for a not-so-old used big-boy >> machine, with the caveat that if/when I need support/parts, they'd >> charge me $fewK just to register the machine with them and they talk to >> me. :( But that would mean physically going to sellers to see the >> machines operate, which may not work for you. Also, some of these >> big-boy machines require 220V, which is not always on hand here in the >> US, depending on where I'd put it. >> >> For you though, I'd stick with the desktop machines... they'll easily do >> what you want. Factor in a couple thousand for a stencil printer (get a >> decent new or used one as that will save you a lot of aggravation), a >> few thousand for a decent reflow oven, and put $15k towards one of the >> Neoden-type machines. Also, avoid IR reflow ovens -- get a basic >> conveyor oven to save yourself a lot of aggravation. >> >> Cheers, >> -Neil. >> >> >> >> On 5/9/2020 11:21 AM, Isaac M. Bavaresco wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I understand your point, but my budget is between US$20,000.00 to >>> US$30,000.00, so I can't afford a Fuji, Essemtec, Panasonic, Samsung, e= tc. >>> >>> My requirements are very low. If I can assemble 20 boards a day I call >>> that a win. Indeed I don't need a machine with a lot of heads, my >>> limiting factor is minimum number of feeders, but both come together. >>> >>> It would be great if some manufacturer had a slow machine with just one >>> or two heads. Indeed, the reason for NeoDen and YingXing machines havin= g >>> so many heads it is because they can't change nozzles, so some of the >>> heads are reserved for placing just one or two parts per board. The >>> number of heads available to assemble most parts may be greatly reduced= .. >>> >>> That Charmhigh machine that changes nozzles could have just 4 heads and >>> perhaps be faster than the others. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Isaac >>> >>> >>> >>> Em 09/05/2020 11:25, louijp@gmail.com escreveu: >>>> Isaac,I do not know those chinese P&P machines, as all my work life I = was partial to Fuji. They were the best value for the money.Before purchasi= ng any equipment, try to find a shop/plant using what you're looking to buy= .. Ask also for references from the supplier.He should be happy to put you i= n contact with happy users.That what I was always doing before buying new S= MT lines.One of my quality test was what I called the Nickel test. I would= put a nickel (5 cent US) standing on its edge while the machine was runnin= g. Fuji always passed as they are built for long use without vibrations. Ve= ry few companies could compare. Another test was feeder change time, as thi= s affect your production because feeder change is down time.But at that tim= e, I was spending $20 million a year in SMT lines, so I had to be careful w= ith my investment. >>>> Just a few thoughts >>>> >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>>> =20 >>>> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 9:33 AM, Isaac M. Bavaresco wrote: Dear All, >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm planning to buy a pick and place machine and the Chinese ones seem >>>> to have improved a lot recently. >>>> >>>> Machines from the big brands are extremely powerful and precise, but >>>> also extremely expensive too. >>>> >>>> >>>> Some time ago, NeoDen started offering a cheap P&P machine but it was = a >>>> little too small and seemed to be directed to hobbyists. It did not >>>> support traditional feeders and did not have machine vision. >>>> >>>> For some time, while NeoDen was struggling with its hobby machine, oth= er >>>> Chinese brands started offering nice looking machines, superior to Neo= Den's. >>>> >>>> Now NeoDen is selling the new NeoDen 8, that supports feeders and visi= on. >>>> >>>> The two other companies that I found and sell nice machines are YingXi= ng >>>> and Charmhigh. >>>> >>>> The NeoDen 8 machine has 8 heads, 10 cameras and supports 80 feeders, >>>> but it doesn't have automatic nozzle change. >>>> >>>> Charmhigh offers machines with 4 to 8 heads, 6 to 10 cameras and suppo= rt >>>> for 30 to 100 feeders. The two biggest machines, (6 and 8 heads), >>>> support automatic nozzle change. The 8 heads/100 feeders machine is tw= o >>>> expensive, about twice the price of the 6 heads one and the competitor= s. >>>> >>>> YingXing offers machines in the same range as CharmHigh, but they don'= t >>>> have auto nozzle change. >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm pending to the Charmhigh machine with 6 heads and 60 feeders, >>>> although I need a little more than 60 feeders right now. To overcome >>>> that problem, I think I could put some of the biggest parts on trays, = so >>>> it would free a lot of space for narrower feeders. >>>> >>>> The main point that directs my choice it the automatic nozzle change a= nd >>>> the support for all the existing feeder widths. >>>> >>>> >>>> Does anybody know any of these machines? Do they really can be used in= a >>>> professional assembly line? How about precision and durability? Anywhe= re >>>> else to look for? >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Isaac >>>> >>>> >>>> --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .