Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 9 May 2020 09:11:06 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 049G2CnQ020529; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:02:17 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 049G2BGE020526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:02:12 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 049G1h1K005340 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:01:48 -0400 Received: from w92expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.70) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:01:24 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92expo16.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:02:09 -0400 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.169) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 12:02:09 -0400 Received: from MWHPR1201CA0001.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:4a::11) by DM5PR0102MB3496.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:4:a5::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:02:08 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT031.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:4a:cafe::8d) by MWHPR1201CA0001.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:301:4a::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.28 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:02:08 +0000 Received: from premium47-4.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.244) by CO1NAM03FT031.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.27 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 16:02:08 +0000 Received: from 072-238-001-037.res.spectrum.com ([72.238.1.37]:51442 helo=[192.168.10.107]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jXRvO-000r8C-W8; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:02:07 -0400 From: Neil To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 09:02:01 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Pick & Place Thread-Topic: [EE] Pick & Place Thread-Index: AdYmHHI8+GOAkBz3RNGU/7v+ASJjAA== Message-ID: <5EB6D3F9.4030307@narwani.org> References: <1097603349.116654.1589034339442@mail.yahoo.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=m8ENsjiEhI0mzfHQLtk3gbX5Jg9lz+jCWvkx+wy0yIk=; b=PCw+20Jdher/VyWo3UQoYEeWmZ /QgxvP/asNY6bBt3wki6PQoAbm3IVKnst3UbzbUXi+FN6xIW7MvI1w4FzrzUcb7/tLWSdvaaZIKj/ 3ygQFEDJ8m6v9VwnlymKTNDcmVtNhzQ78QrvELa7Bb3NKwpPqNoM2u0TEv5gF7GRT3hxVj0x3Dsag tjlQuPxOgX+k9PNS7686gATdniwn8GBBPpJVSx1Lh/0Z5w/WI65ZZpjOlyVoY/nvr/Z8E1ywpNQzH TrwJJLzuoJ0CzN4MXaNrpqu89u8T1W8dUpPHHueyZ2sJiJhRHg8fs//W+BvjDmc7tpyph++g/eyrr 8BQ2P1rQ==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.244) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org;compauth=pass reason=109 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Isaac, Few more random notes... Is this the budget for the whole line, or just the PnP? Also, I'm not=20 sure how much of your budget will go to import duties etc, but let's say=20 you have US$20k for the price of the machine(s). That can get you a=20 lot, especially if all you want to do is 20 boards a day. This was my=20 quandry also -- I wanted low volume/low speed, but with the ability to=20 0603's and even 0402's. Older machines (lower cost) wouldn't guarantee=20 they'd do 0603's reliably, but were slower. Newer machines could do=20 0603's reliably, but they seemed to focus on high-speed/volume and the=20 price went up significantly for that. Personally, with that budget, I'd look for a not-so-old used big-boy=20 machine, with the caveat that if/when I need support/parts, they'd=20 charge me $fewK just to register the machine with them and they talk to=20 me. :( But that would mean physically going to sellers to see the=20 machines operate, which may not work for you. Also, some of these=20 big-boy machines require 220V, which is not always on hand here in the=20 US, depending on where I'd put it. For you though, I'd stick with the desktop machines... they'll easily do=20 what you want. Factor in a couple thousand for a stencil printer (get a=20 decent new or used one as that will save you a lot of aggravation), a=20 few thousand for a decent reflow oven, and put $15k towards one of the=20 Neoden-type machines. Also, avoid IR reflow ovens -- get a basic=20 conveyor oven to save yourself a lot of aggravation. Cheers, -Neil. On 5/9/2020 11:21 AM, Isaac M. Bavaresco wrote: > Hi, > > I understand your point, but my budget is between US$20,000.00 to > US$30,000.00, so I can't afford a Fuji, Essemtec, Panasonic, Samsung, etc= .. > > My requirements are very low. If I can assemble 20 boards a day I call > that a win. Indeed I don't need a machine with a lot of heads, my > limiting factor is minimum number of feeders, but both come together. > > It would be great if some manufacturer had a slow machine with just one > or two heads. Indeed, the reason for NeoDen and YingXing machines having > so many heads it is because they can't change nozzles, so some of the > heads are reserved for placing just one or two parts per board. The > number of heads available to assemble most parts may be greatly reduced. > > That Charmhigh machine that changes nozzles could have just 4 heads and > perhaps be faster than the others. > > Cheers, > > Isaac > > > > Em 09/05/2020 11:25, louijp@gmail.com escreveu: >> Isaac,I do not know those chinese P&P machines, as all my work life I wa= s partial to Fuji. They were the best value for the money.Before purchasing= any equipment, try to find a shop/plant using what you're looking to buy. = Ask also for references from the supplier.He should be happy to put you in = contact with happy users.That what I was always doing before buying new SMT= lines.One of my quality test was what I called the Nickel test. I would p= ut a nickel (5 cent US) standing on its edge while the machine was running.= Fuji always passed as they are built for long use without vibrations. Very= few companies could compare. Another test was feeder change time, as this = affect your production because feeder change is down time.But at that time,= I was spending $20 million a year in SMT lines, so I had to be careful wit= h my investment. >> Just a few thoughts >> >> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >> =20 >> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 9:33 AM, Isaac M. Bavaresco wrote: Dear All, >> >> >> I'm planning to buy a pick and place machine and the Chinese ones seem >> to have improved a lot recently. >> >> Machines from the big brands are extremely powerful and precise, but >> also extremely expensive too. >> >> >> Some time ago, NeoDen started offering a cheap P&P machine but it was a >> little too small and seemed to be directed to hobbyists. It did not >> support traditional feeders and did not have machine vision. >> >> For some time, while NeoDen was struggling with its hobby machine, other >> Chinese brands started offering nice looking machines, superior to NeoDe= n's. >> >> Now NeoDen is selling the new NeoDen 8, that supports feeders and vision= .. >> >> The two other companies that I found and sell nice machines are YingXing >> and Charmhigh. >> >> The NeoDen 8 machine has 8 heads, 10 cameras and supports 80 feeders, >> but it doesn't have automatic nozzle change. >> >> Charmhigh offers machines with 4 to 8 heads, 6 to 10 cameras and support >> for 30 to 100 feeders. The two biggest machines, (6 and 8 heads), >> support automatic nozzle change. The 8 heads/100 feeders machine is two >> expensive, about twice the price of the 6 heads one and the competitors. >> >> YingXing offers machines in the same range as CharmHigh, but they don't >> have auto nozzle change. >> >> >> I'm pending to the Charmhigh machine with 6 heads and 60 feeders, >> although I need a little more than 60 feeders right now. To overcome >> that problem, I think I could put some of the biggest parts on trays, so >> it would free a lot of space for narrower feeders. >> >> The main point that directs my choice it the automatic nozzle change and >> the support for all the existing feeder widths. >> >> >> Does anybody know any of these machines? Do they really can be used in a >> professional assembly line? How about precision and durability? Anywhere >> else to look for? >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Isaac >> >> >> --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .