Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:24:21 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04NIEiPS013742; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:15:01 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 04NIEhlv013739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:14:43 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 04NIDrcV020748 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:13:57 -0400 Received: from w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:14:34 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92expo31.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:14:42 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.170) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 23 May 2020 14:14:42 -0400 Received: from MWHPR12CA0049.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:103::11) by BN6PR01MB2482.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:404:52::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3000.27; Sat, 23 May 2020 18:14:41 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT047.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:103:cafe::c) by MWHPR12CA0049.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:103::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 23 May 2020 18:14:41 +0000 Received: from mailscanner.virtbiz.com (208.77.216.252) by CO1NAM03FT047.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 23 May 2020 18:14:40 +0000 Received: from s18855546.onlinehome-server.com (s18855546.onlinehome-server.com [74.208.193.200]) by mailscanner.virtbiz.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 04NIEU4T029615 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 13:14:35 -0500 Received: from mai.hallikainen.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s18855546.onlinehome-server.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 04NIEREc000774 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:14:27 -0700 Received: (from apache@localhost) by mai.hallikainen.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id 04NIERIp000768; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:14:27 -0700 Received: from 97.118.126.255 (SquirrelMail authenticated user harold) by mai.hallikainen.org with HTTP; Sat, 23 May 2020 11:14:27 -0700 From: Harold Hallikainen To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 11:14:27 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] MOSFET Gate Voltage Thread-Topic: [EE] MOSFET Gate Voltage Thread-Index: AdYxL2FErCuolzn0Qt6Iuarw30NDPQ== Message-ID: <4e48b07d99a1a37468b1b69b6c5d0812.squirrel@mai.hallikainen.org> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of mai.hallikainen.org designates 208.77.216.252 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=208.77.216.252; helo=mailscanner.virtbiz.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitprod.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-mitprod-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NDBaZE4EZimtvisbqS+JfCjKoV+EWOTDe6G01XXfcOQ=; b=QFR9mIejPodk7PERpxXzNGpdX/B/i03rQ/H4WOeUHK0in1oX81sdHpvGYXlmRzFBLEUXy1p6dqo7kPROC87Pgy2js6CYIYCkeRzqefJMp9xJ0DP6ba912R0jEnxUwfmDtPjEwxLXl/qcE0aGXLiOjFA+CaeZpLlQ945qo45kc8Y= authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 208.77.216.252) smtp.mailfrom=mai.hallikainen.org; mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mit.edu; dmarc=permerror action=none header.from=mai.hallikainen.org;compauth=pass reason=111 user-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-5.el6 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-authentication-warning: mai.hallikainen.org: apache set sender to harold@mai.hallikainen.org using -f x-spam-status: No x-greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mailscanner.virtbiz.com [208.77.216.252]); Sat, 23 May 2020 13:14:35 -0500 (CDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I'd certainly look at the datasheet of the FET. But, in general, I see nothing wrong with the gate voltage being higher than the drain voltage. In fact, that is a typical condition once a FET is switched on. Harold > I'd advise reducing the control signal to 3.3 volts. Without more > information it's hard to say what might (or might not) happen. > > On Saturday, May 23, 2020, Josh Koffman wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm modifying an existing battery powered LED lamp. I haven't fully >> completed my investigation, but I believe I have identified a MOSFET >> that is responsible for controlling the LEDs. I want to hijack that >> MOSFET and inject my own control signal. If my current theories are >> correct, this shouldn't be too hard. >> >> However, the circuit is running off a battery at 3.3V. The control >> signal I plan on using is going to be 5V. So that means the gate of >> the MOSFET will have more voltage on it than across D-S. Will this >> work, or will this end badly for the MOSFET? >> >> Thank you! >> >> Josh >> -- >> A common mistake that people make when trying to design something >> completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete >> fools. >> -Douglas Adams >> -- >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive >> View/change your membership options at >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist >> > > > -- > Jason White > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com Not sent from an iPhone. --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .