Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:07:43 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03ULwPXU017066; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:58:49 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03ULwOOx017062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:58:24 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03ULvr3j012186 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:57:54 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:57:25 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:57:53 -0400 Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.173) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:57:53 -0400 Received: from MWHPR19CA0006.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:d4::16) by MW2PR0102MB3497.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:302:2::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:57:51 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT055.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:d4:cafe::3c) by MWHPR19CA0006.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:d4::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:57:51 +0000 Received: from premium47-4.web-hosting.com (68.65.123.244) by CO1NAM03FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 21:57:50 +0000 Received: from 072-238-001-037.res.spectrum.com ([72.238.1.37]:60036 helo=[192.168.10.107]) by premium47.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jUHBi-0002gG-Be; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 17:57:50 -0400 From: Neil To: "piclist@mit.edu" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:57:38 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] LED Matrix CC/CA Thread-Topic: [EE] LED Matrix CC/CA Thread-Index: AdYfO8X6yCAjMuSTQJeRX0utuYHStA== Message-ID: <5EAB49D2.9060407@narwani.org> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: narwani.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=narwani.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Reply-To:To:References:Subject:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YB+rpOezUAYdvp2vyvrYudicpU/C/4lKbdf8dP6plsM=; b=F5uHuE1tunsVGhkwlSu0QtH8eF 2uVsgL0bdRy56Pnv6cZUgeeZmYnBpzWCz1aatXFz3bpvOFf4p2MSsZGBiXYw/yW86byRH3WsB0V9B co53cSud6A4iHpPWgxpZM3EaOfBM8zRBngzywb+bx8bJ1J3QxSRg/t5Yt1HOaRg1UCIGavmedwPRW O9LFAHgq2h7sxpCnhlDjShT7IIxiRceSldtrlBapZfmvRAz1bc/Y8kNLNrO98uk6vHrk1N+0uUBIb tbX1TPrDykWehLPETl4zVbAZZZr75+yVhRzPYubd+SvI3B7GVUdlGhe9Fk2TEbVG005m2FDRNGXWZ vUu5rvDg==; authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 68.65.123.244) smtp.mailfrom=narwani.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=narwani.org;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=narwani.org;compauth=pass reason=109 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-source-args: x-source-dir: x-antiabuse: Sender Address Domain - narwani.org x-source: x-authenticated-sender: premium47.web-hosting.com: ca4@narwani.org x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Yes, if all the anodes are wired together to the COM pin then it's=20 common-anode. And vice versa. Often, I've seen 2 common pins, which is the same common-anode broken=20 out to 2 pins that are internally connected together. Yes you can use CA or CC, but you're circuit will change, of course. I generally lean towards CC, because switching on the whole digit (when=20 multiplexing) is easier to have a transistor/FET switch low-side, rather=20 than high-side. Cheers, -Neil. On 4/30/2020 4:20 PM, Josh Koffman wrote: > Hi all, > > I need a quick double check. > > I'm looking at using a small 8x8 LED matrix in a project. It's been > awhile since I've dealt with them. If I recall correctly, in an 8x8 > LED matrix what makes it common cathode or common anode is really just > how it's wired, correct? Since I'm making my own board, I could get > either and have it work as long as I adjusted the wiring for the > correct pinout? > > I haven't done a ton of sourcing yet, but a preliminary investigate > showed CA as a bit cheaper, though the driver I want to use prefers > CC. > > Thank you! > > Josh --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .