Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:31:51 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03UKLZqW005769; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:22:12 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03UKLXUT005761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21:34 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03UKKsuE001571 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21:15 -0400 Received: from oc11expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.48) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:20:49 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo17.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21:17 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.176) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:21:17 -0400 Received: from DM5PR08CA0043.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:60::32) by CY1PR01MB2186.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:600:1::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.22; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:21:16 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT027.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:60:cafe::cb) by DM5PR08CA0043.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:60::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:21:16 +0000 Received: from mail-il1-f171.google.com (209.85.166.171) by DM3NAM03FT027.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2958.24 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:21:16 +0000 Received: by mail-il1-f171.google.com with SMTP id e8so2639986ilm.7 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Josh Koffman To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:20:48 -0700 Subject: [EE] LED Matrix CC/CA Thread-Topic: [EE] LED Matrix CC/CA Thread-Index: AdYfLmGirLkm7g0cQA6YyghovM+5Gw== Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.166.171 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.166.171; helo=mail-il1-f171.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dgtsoF0HW8aGmjViTTSpx9C0qARx03Tfraz1kd4q4H0=; b=eEHWOTehcXOgKKWPDQGuJ7ZhTM+/hXirBs/WSvOO1gK3dlu/31QhUUwJ5xIMaLR2ck T+xh/6XXmbQDGfDJza1srUF4lBmhp+GXRFAsvQ0a6ge4KLlM2lXULkkMOLybVGQjtZXg T2FJmvV3BPjPE25p4MwTNKwHJIi+b5Eatk6f+y0R8p1/Km9pUNfJGakQjcoUX81D2dSY FDUj+p8t0dUO9tHFVnVkw0aD74d2IOPyk8R4F27gRYjcZzUf82aM3KwujNlM71OexHHB Amzd43mUvdiYi9omGhZplYAptfD83qVdiun9Lf1WFnpqfLP7W03bfZji6pJiYrH+KsSK zaFw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.166.171) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a92:3509:: with SMTP id c9mr157988ila.262.1588278074204; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:21:14 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi all, I need a quick double check. I'm looking at using a small 8x8 LED matrix in a project. It's been awhile since I've dealt with them. If I recall correctly, in an 8x8 LED matrix what makes it common cathode or common anode is really just how it's wired, correct? Since I'm making my own board, I could get either and have it work as long as I adjusted the wiring for the correct pinout? I haven't done a ton of sourcing yet, but a preliminary investigate showed CA as a bit cheaper, though the driver I want to use prefers CC. Thank you! Josh --=20 A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -Douglas Adams --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .