Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:15:39 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03SJ5hYG007023; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:06:15 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03SJ5g9X007020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:42 -0400 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03SJ5Laa005111 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:24 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:04:38 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by w92exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:05 -0400 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.100) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:05:04 -0400 Received: from MWHPR17CA0089.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:c2::27) by BL0PR01MB4548.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:8e::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.13; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:05:03 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT040.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:c2:cafe::6b) by MWHPR17CA0089.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:c2::27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.13 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:05:03 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (209.85.218.51) by CO1NAM03FT040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.183) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:05:02 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id nv1so18178436ejb.0 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:04:49 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Seeking audio relay advice Thread-Topic: [EE] Seeking audio relay advice Thread-Index: AdYdkWe/xwZPnGZSQp+pI/NxZl9A8Q== Message-ID: References: <8a833047-7b51-5866-e397-2cfed473973b@triad.rr.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.218.51 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.218.51; helo=mail-ej1-f51.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=BJx9xs0KjbLFvSzIx562aKLf4X+bqwjXBXegD2Fsh1w=; b=ZirHhubZLFnyl05WaniE7oTTeRxjygyq8Q91hZT28FS9oYMPcasCRP4yMI42wminem WLclT1kdfdBhASXf61jP+2LUj+Yi0R2NaXj0Cmtx1ideDo4Ao5Ixs+bCZTs/ET9wTgdb +2ac7jUvsO88JaJpHNHE47vO2Jv7NrSPWrwMKvkG0F8d/pZu2DtkTEsq9zrv3JyJpGJQ D7dvJMt+xrgtpTAlptdUl2hZUq2zw/TEWurCArY3u3G3c9eEEqZObxfMETp1nPEKqjCU wqd42CDAJB1Scd5BeTZjjmeNhZbyPoWCFfURuUcIDKje6UnI+fiKjoc8F43BHQ83tnkZ PD3Q== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.218.51) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:4c46:: with SMTP id d6mr25560899ejw.257.1588100700754; Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:05:00 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Bob, Why are you so convinced that reed switches wouldn't suffer the same problem? It's still a contact and it depends entirely on the material of the contacts. The original relay sounds like it had gold-plated contacts which I think should work with dry switching - at least until the gold wears off. Mercury-wetted is probably the best solution. Another would probably be to introduce a DC bias current (although I know you don't want to alter the design of the amp). Sean On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 2:26 PM Bob Blick wrote: > Thanks everyone who replied and for the suggestions. I decided to take th= e > chance and for $26 I have 20 HB2E-DC24V relays coming from an Aliexpress > vendor. Although I'm sure what will show up will be relays, whether they > are counterfeit or used is unknown at this time. The picture and > description seem correct. > > As to the question about the failure mode, it's a contact issue, and the > symptoms are distortion, noise, and signal dropping out. Cycling the tape > monitor and input selectors clears it up for an annoyingly short time. Wh= en > I originally got the unit I popped the tops off the relays(this unit has > the original Omron unsealed relays) and squirted Cramolin, that worked fo= r > a month or so. > > This is a preamplifier, so the signals are all low level audio under 2 > volts AC, and very low current. So it's the textbook low current dry > contact problem. > > I love the idea of hacking the relays apart and putting reed switches int= o > the the original magnetic structure. Maybe I'd try it if I didn't have to > do it for 13 relays, each requiring two SPDT reed switches! > > In 2 months when the relays finally arrive from China I'll post a reply > with what showed up and if they work. > > Cheerful regards, Bob > > ________________________________________ > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of John > Ferrell > Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2020 10:39 PM > To: piclist@mit.edu > Subject: Re: [EE] Seeking audio relay advice > > > On 4/25/2020 5:54 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote: > > the real question is what is the > > failure mode on the relays. > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .