Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:42:30 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03RHXMRA012038; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:30 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03RHXLD6012035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:21 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03RHXxu9004869 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:34:05 -0400 Received: from oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:32:45 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) by oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:08 -0400 Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.66.47) by oc11exhyb1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:08 -0400 Received: from MWHPR20CA0038.namprd20.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ed::24) by BYAPR01MB4198.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:5e::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.22; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:33:06 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT061.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:ed:cafe::84) by MWHPR20CA0038.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:ed::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2937.13 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:33:06 +0000 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (209.85.221.44) by CO1NAM03FT061.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:33:05 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id j1so21546770wrt.1 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:33:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Denny Esterline To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:34:30 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] Voltage regulator with high input voltage Thread-Topic: [EE] Voltage regulator with high input voltage Thread-Index: AdYcuznvZMg/EMbgQdybKfHvih72gA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.221.44 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.221.44; helo=mail-wr1-f44.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aIb542g8BRz4fXkr50DZGOGZ3Sxowb1TfQP3XFf9oYk=; b=DhzbTD9F637h1wH85bBTjIaxKq7iwUUk1FETQ9Ej/65l56eMIxSLvfEUSlOMqF66pp y1Gx4n4nYr4xfk2q0M0D6PQ294JRGTNp3zq5jNROtKxLqKrFC+uv0M6HY7HSf+JqLeFE IByjrwlFKicsSVIvDESHtckmxi2TKxYkjPEMgX+EWvrYb6R8uTYhDRMmqpLvg2q7NGyF lOfwIWX0vxaM/UMMKxu0CQhHHIusMiY1uWklEqtUlFAKZ0U325fITzgK7PfO0nyc9vYg fYBetxo2tbWv9lanSo3QVruiDnq2mcC3iwosNk5bh83PUmI60VOu20rQiGBy9Fkkx3Qp QXkQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.221.44) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:adf:fa41:: with SMTP id y1mr27723329wrr.131.1588008783535; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 It's a bit "long in the tooth" but I typically use the LM2576HV for such. 3A @ 60V input is a bit more than you'll need, but... Since you're doing a one-off, a PCB module might be something to consider. Here's a $5 example https://www.ebay.com/i/303534088139 Though I'm certain there are many, many more out there. -Denny On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:26 AM David C Brown wrote: > I am designing a current monitor for my e-bike. Using an INA169 hi side > current senor into a mid range PIC with a two digit LED display. > > Problem is getting the 5 volts for the PIC from the e bike battery which = is > nominally 36v but can rise to over 40 volts when fully charged. Most sma= ll > linear regulators seem to be rated at 36v.. > > Current would be a couple of milliamps with the display off (most of the > time). Nearer 100 with the display on.. > > Any suggestions > > > __________________________________________ > David C Brown > 43 Bings Road > Whaley Bridge > High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > > > > > *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .