Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:46:32 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03K7b4Ds009932; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:37:25 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03K7b3dq009928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:37:03 -0400 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03K7anxr005702 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:36:49 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:36:53 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:37:01 -0400 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.102) by oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 03:37:01 -0400 Received: from MWHPR11CA0003.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:1::13) by SN6PR01MB4480.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:ea::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.29; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:37:00 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT036.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:1:cafe::6e) by MWHPR11CA0003.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:301:1::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:37:00 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-f170.google.com (209.85.215.170) by CO1NAM03FT036.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:36:59 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-f170.google.com with SMTP id w11so4625624pga.12 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:36:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esk ([1.129.198.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r128sm263488pfc.141.2020.04.20.00.36.57 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james by esk with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQQz7-0000DA-Ha; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:36:53 +1000 From: James Cameron To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:36:53 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] LDO reg keeps failing. Looking for suggestions. Thread-Topic: [EE] LDO reg keeps failing. Looking for suggestions. Thread-Index: AdYW58/yAcejdUpvSX+EsOPtWHfDww== Message-ID: <20200420073653.GL12237@laptop.org> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of laptop.org designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.215.170; helo=mail-pg1-f170.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=laptop-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=LMm7BR1KqXi7f6Q4mdzm0bFr/eZ97m50cSwVTuxgSow=; b=buOeCqa1/EEVFKxBExyNkB5mUjnK5OoCN8kSy3p6wwXfFjpcA72c7nxHURqhU5/bgz tMasB+OoynFn6Mw1Mazu0fv7aIOD9FyC/P8HAw1Qqfn47bb5Po5OT6Y646SaPOFhGLYh 9FOpf/pLszLKq/mJmYuz9yE0erf9RoSprvC/PV/JAQDVY3FljX5zDS+GQYagCFbA+q4C L3iWdNzo26B+jOCpP4pvYSmLFPsyvKIXi5KC7g2dbpBgMOK3ovAmOXCNFga6LmN0S7AX CUfP84zQeBvAX22/BSpoWtK2m3q8cIEK2eDm8hxNkQTc95Tonm5LPmE2P0HNurIkVTbz jroQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.215.170) smtp.mailfrom=laptop.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=laptop-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=laptop.org;compauth=pass reason=109 user-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a63:ef4b:: with SMTP id c11mr14257335pgk.400.1587368218585; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:36:58 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Looking at your schematic, when Q2 or Q4 conduct, there may be a time during which VCC will fall below VDD. I've had this happen in exciting ways once before, with C1 catching fire, and the fix that worked for me was a diode between VCC and C1/U2. On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:06:24AM -0600, James Burkart wrote: > VDD is 5V, and it's provided by the LDO regulator. VCC is the battery > voltage and is anywhere from 6.5 to 8.2V. I don't know what circumstances > would lead to VCC dropping below VDD. Could you shed some light on this? >=20 > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 12:25 AM David VanHorn wrote: >=20 > > If vcc can rise above the input then most pnp regulators will fail > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 11:44 PM James Burkart > > wrote: > > > > > Hey everyone! Here's a little motor driver board I made that works gr= eat, > > > until it doesn't. The voltage regulator keeps failing on me. I've use= d a > > > couple different LDO regulators and it always happens. It's always at > > > random times. So I am pretty sure it's EMI from the brushed motors. I= f > > > someone here has a few minutes, could you look over my schematic and > > > recommend changes? > > > > > > The board is powered from a 2S lipo, so 6.5 to 8.2V. For the flywheel > > > output there are 2 motors in parallel that draw about 3A total when > > > running, and a stall current of about 20A. The pusher output runs 1 m= otor > > > that draws about 100mA with a stall current of about 3A. I do use PWM= to > > > control the speed of the pusher motor. > > > > > > If you're wondering, this driver board is for flywheel Nerf blasters. > > > > > > -- > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > James Burkart > > > *925.667.7175* > > > > > > *Schematic:* > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dgLf3sFNzFxvEuzaqTuIHd4_VSUfNbg8 > > > -- > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > > View/change your membership options at > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > --=20 > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .