Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:36:30 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03K6PMCN028820; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:25:43 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03K6PJms028815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:25:20 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03K6PP51002497 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:25:25 -0400 Received: from w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:24:41 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92expo11.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:25:18 -0400 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.171) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 02:25:18 -0400 Received: from MWHPR04CA0055.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:6c::17) by BYAPR01MB4087.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:5d::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.28; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:25:17 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT021.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:6c:cafe::cf) by MWHPR04CA0055.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:6c::17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.26 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:25:17 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (209.85.166.52) by CO1NAM03FT021.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:25:17 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id 19so9657418ioz.10 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:25:16 -0700 (PDT) From: David VanHorn To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:25:04 -0700 Subject: Re: [EE] LDO reg keeps failing. Looking for suggestions. Thread-Topic: [EE] LDO reg keeps failing. Looking for suggestions. Thread-Index: AdYW3gdUNR6i7O7wRG2Hkr/BsQG0gA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.166.52 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.166.52; helo=mail-io1-f52.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=udj9EI55NLm6GYWJ4PM2rDrdG52yalkbSSKmaHZUPPo=; b=AQns2rUU/5obYOm7W8xrR3tsabBBUmpPjhuRjB9OVTY7iTt72HTiPJ8+e9AaC9VFfg C0lje+v6vz1PRR6FOSxFMP6XYP+2Ga2VHiO9rGjtFD69A+djgM3TSg9X6h2dVkV1fTaU IsWVyhne13GmjTQcR3rUJNBYaqTWPDNU96DokXagGDAbioQ+1FCH5PpvCsGFH3o7+c+c kw/JY2YFgWaLOpLP54CSA/muXurz6FraZlcdgLWych2hSv3JI3OL9dUvin0UM+pV4sgd MVFIYsoqXN11zlxWuCWVN7HXFrDhj8wel043bRL1QKBd0ROliEGnVWG+uPMS2ekJWAo4 8hdg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.166.52) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a6b:7605:: with SMTP id g5mr14053704iom.189.1587363915872; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 If vcc can rise above the input then most pnp regulators will fail On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 11:44 PM James Burkart wrote: > Hey everyone! Here's a little motor driver board I made that works great, > until it doesn't. The voltage regulator keeps failing on me. I've used a > couple different LDO regulators and it always happens. It's always at > random times. So I am pretty sure it's EMI from the brushed motors. If > someone here has a few minutes, could you look over my schematic and > recommend changes? > > The board is powered from a 2S lipo, so 6.5 to 8.2V. For the flywheel > output there are 2 motors in parallel that draw about 3A total when > running, and a stall current of about 20A. The pusher output runs 1 motor > that draws about 100mA with a stall current of about 3A. I do use PWM to > control the speed of the pusher motor. > > If you're wondering, this driver board is for flywheel Nerf blasters. > > -- > Sincerely, > > James Burkart > *925.667.7175* > > *Schematic:* > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dgLf3sFNzFxvEuzaqTuIHd4_VSUfNbg8 > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .