Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:39:00 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03HGShgR003073; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:45 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 03HGSfDs003069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:42 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 03HGSGZm031481 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:20 -0400 Received: from w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:27:51 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:26 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.173) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:26 -0400 Received: from DM5PR2201CA0002.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:14::12) by BYAPR01MB4598.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:8a::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.26; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:28:24 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT040.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:14:cafe::9a) by DM5PR2201CA0002.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:4:14::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:28:24 +0000 Received: from mulvey.us (24.169.71.174) by DM3NAM03FT040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.25 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:28:24 +0000 Received: from Win10ProDT ([192.168.100.55]) by mulvey.us with MailEnable ESMTPA; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:21 -0400 From: Allen Mulvey To: 'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.' Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:28:21 -0700 Subject: RE: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][OT:: Making Moonshine Thread-Topic: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][OT:: Making Moonshine Thread-Index: AQKb1rwieESX3oF0u1R7CuP6VZhabQI3NcSApuBC+2A= Message-ID: <001101d614d5$35aba800$a102f800$@amulvey.com> References: <000001d614d4$c91001a0$5b3004e0$@amulvey.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <000001d614d4$c91001a0$5b3004e0$@amulvey.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amulvey.com designates 24.169.71.174 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=24.169.71.174; helo=mulvey.us; dkim-signature: v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; d=amulvey.com; s=amulvey; a=rsa-sha256; bh=uPehpg88qMetNxVB6xEafYoql+yPvvAKFzz0C49CdIA=; b=U4uyHhLuklj6ymnh5/NzEA6SYcZpVOTllMiGvqesUOI4ip9O+0II/OpAZaIbZEOFT HKu9o8uywezHJD3FH3Edk+S0sFFiDOwwfvQsbeE+tU5Ggx5BAtwuoH6Fa8GYh01UNbm nvvPfAyVAQM2z2rtY1v6CE8WHpBzk30BE4AnK4Q=; authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 24.169.71.174) smtp.mailfrom=amulvey.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=amulvey.com;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=amulvey.com;compauth=pass reason=109 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-me-bayesian: 0.000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I think I misread your post. You are using the light bulb to warm the fermenting mash not to actually distill it. Sorry. Allen -----Original Message----- From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Allen Mulvey Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:25 PM To: 'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.' Subject: RE: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][OT:: Making Moonshine I'm wondering about something. From what I recall from college chemistry (half a century ago) temperature is critical for successful fractional distillation of most substances. It does not seem that a 100W light bulb could maintain 20 liters at about 78.5C which I believe is the required temperature for ethanol. (Temperature is measured in the vapor above the liquid. Actual temperature will vary a bit depending on other factors, pressure, etc.) This site says, "A good distillation column will produce a mixture of 95 percent alcohol and 5 percent water." https://sciencing.com/separate-alcohol-water-8626016.html Allen -----Original Message----- From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of RussellMc Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:44 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][OT:: Making Moonshine *Summary: Looking for advice on making high alcohol % mix from sucrose.* I propose to distill this to make hand sanitiser for friends / others. __________________ I wish to make what could be mistaken for moonshine :-) The end result will be hand sanitiser - or will be if I get enough alcohol yield. I'm a teetotaller and the mix is sucrose, water and yeast, so it's unlikely to be very attractive to many. I'm told that with the right yeasts alcohol endpoints of 15-17% can be reached. I'm also told that breadmaking yests are liable to only reach about 5%. My first batch based on web advice, uses 4 kg of sucrose, water to about 20 litres and a copious dollop of bread making yeast. I'm warming it with a 100 Watt incandescent lightbulb rescued from the stygian gloom of obsolete technology. Based on CO2 being liberated, progress is slow. "Proper" high alcohol yeasts are said to be expensive, but more importabntly, are not available in our current 'lockdown' situation. I imagine that once I get a high alcohol yeast I should be able to run an ongoing breeder plant, as for decades ago ginger beer. I'm hoping that I may be able to use a high alcohol bottled beer to provide enough starter yeast to get a plant going. *Any practical advice on achieving high alcohol percentage and rapid brewing times would be appreciated. * *Any thoughts on using a high alcohol beer as a yeast starter?* *_______________________* IF I can get 10% from 4kg sugar in a 20l batch that's 2l of alcohol (based on volume. =3D 8 x 250 ml sanitiser packs. So cost / 250 ml raw materials only + labour at $0.01/hour is about $1/bottle. Better than the current typical $24/bottle when it can be found. ______________________________ Denaturing? I made it. That should be enough :-) Russell --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .