Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 04:33:53 -0700 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 02TBNeAr003129; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:24:11 -0400 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 02TBNbhS003121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:23:38 -0400 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 02TBNpGg032337 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:23:51 -0400 Received: from w92expo18.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.72) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:23:04 -0400 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92expo18.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:23:37 -0400 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.174) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 07:23:36 -0400 Received: from MWHPR22CA0058.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:12a::20) by MWHPR0101MB2893.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:301:33::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.20; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:23:35 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT026.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:12a:cafe::cc) by MWHPR22CA0058.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:12a::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.20 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:23:35 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com (209.85.208.66) by CO1NAM03FT026.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.162) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.17 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 11:23:35 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id cf14so17323186edb.13 for ; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 04:23:35 -0700 (PDT) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. CC: Dennis Sanner , ApptechNZ , RossGMail , "ken@elecsyn.com" Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2020 04:22:55 -0700 Subject: [OT]:: COVID-19 & stuff Thread-Topic: [OT]:: COVID-19 & stuff Thread-Index: AdYFve0mY+8mA4P5S6OUF5S1BEH7rA== Message-ID: References: <5E7AAEB3.12882.201CA133@brent.eds.co.nz> <2981f858-c60f-243b-a846-4c549892637e@triad.rr.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <2981f858-c60f-243b-a846-4c549892637e@triad.rr.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.66 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.66; helo=mail-ed1-f66.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W5dlKqhRP1gBe7hn9uGAiu1m1FPJw+w5nurKIdFPvIg=; b=Qn2/qYHI14X5m4K6aMINjM+lQ/KY619qBgu3gmwlGS49RAWEOD4xf7h2JjdyG9p6+4 1u5KDKYokHR0bLefvIC2UGZPGnOu/kQ+yhy7mhTfiD4Mso0wbKYL6X7qxtq6ObnxpdYb 6YMolwJl3efWGTgW07sy90LxNRuRi1AwWkKTd8m8XXzqZ9+D9Vv9iB2iyfkrm4VCqbwx YZ1ikdM91bQoVGKTzzfEVIpIqoK+FpudJUW+iD7rdZqVwaffWl2+CTZmbYzRUEXfT+k4 qakynZP46dNX5pf+4cxf+LkrruedTB4kYXKbUth5Uhr6JjPCVomlTshAsB3e3b86yLYU KtDQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.66) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a50:9b58:: with SMTP id a24mr7186986edj.353.1585481013288; Sun, 29 Mar 2020 04:23:33 -0700 (PDT) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 TL/DR: Image only bit.ly/oggmask02 :-) Subject line changed. On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 16:37, John Ferrell wrote: > I think it best to not rush into anything unless you have some credible data to work with. So far various sources seem to be working with > ambiguous information. There is a lot of good data - but not enough hard certainty about what it tells us, yet. > I have always been led to believe that all virus > slip through a cotton mask with ease. Filter needs to be 0.1 micron and THEN have additional useful properties. N95 masks stop notionally 95% of 0.1 um objects. %% pass through doesn't sound very encouraging :-). N99 also available. I wear an N100 when going out and yesterday added a face shield as well. Chances of meeting the but here are so far low. Lower than low suits me with my stats. [I'm actually healthy enough but I don't look good on paper :-) ]. I use two basic masks with a "gladwrap" plastic layer between - so it is imp[ervious. I breathe via various edges and use sanitiser on the mask edges. Stops direct face to face droplets and, most important, face touching. Shield is an experiment. I'm thinking of adding a Starwars imperial navy helmet :-). For those with facebook this page with image of me relates :-). What you can now wear in public in NZ without a 2nd glance Page bit.ly/oggmask01 Facebook-free image - link will die "after a while": Image only bit.ly/oggmask02 Some suggest that those exposed > wear double up on gloves. I don't understand how these critters move > among victims. What kind of environment do they require to survive? What > is their life cycle? How do they reproduce? > > A few hours on Copper. maybe 4 hours on stainless steel, somewhat longer on cardboard. Varies. Maybe 2 hours as aerosol BUT need to be aerosolised to do this - not an aerosol usually. Entry by nose/mouth - wipe face with hands. What is the effect of steroids (especially predisone and testosterone). > > Have not seen claims thaty steroids bad. BUT NSAIDs may be - still uncertain - Ibuprofen thought possibly bad in SOME cases. Enough of my ranting, I am following Rules and Policies as I understand > them. > > Don't touch face. Disinfect incoming goods or leave say 12 hours. Change clothes and shoes at door if serious. Wash hands etc incoming. Wash often internally just in case [tm] Alcohol 60% and above sanitiser works well. Soap and water 20 seconds good wash said to work - I have some doubts. Maintain separation in public Sanitise each shopping trolley handles etc. Excessively paranoid behaviour may be OTT and not necessary. Or not !!! Russell > > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .