Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:37:19 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01RLRU2Z025798; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:28:00 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01RLRSWj025795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:27:29 -0500 Received: from OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.21]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01RLSWgV003560 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:28:32 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) by OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (18.9.3.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:27:11 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:27:27 -0500 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.45.50) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 16:27:27 -0500 Received: from MWHPR08CA0054.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:c0::28) by SN6PR01MB4847.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:ce::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.21; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:25 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT033.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:c0:cafe::a1) by MWHPR08CA0054.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:c0::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:25 +0000 Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.11.83) by CO1NAM03FT033.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.175) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:24 +0000 Received: from SN1NAM04FT051.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.58) by SN1NAM04HT222.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.89.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.15; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:23 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::3c) by SN1NAM04FT051.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e4c::201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.14 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:22 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1cf1:f69e:a6bb:396]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1cf1:f69e:a6bb:396%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:27:22 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:27:22 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Topic: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Index: AQHV7TgKoys5QxeCwEm/DLsZNSGcv6gvOU0LgAA5GICAABofWQ== Message-ID: References: <5E5760DE.4080102@narwani.org> , <1B8088E5-1798-4821-B6AD-9660383876A8@standingwave.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <1B8088E5-1798-4821-B6AD-9660383876A8@standingwave.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.11.83 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.11.83; helo=NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Cr5euojJRgD8N1hrsGW34I+EVa5AylwsmwCj35Jg0dE=; b=aOqSVMTuR48C+em7fdQirOQ+KWMGlaROcQNbYdeLVTSSoKOiWi9BM7TvpyCyMshEs9sIH4YIYObZwvQU7C2V1HNEdXuj8OCb539394hhEJHgpP8My3YqfQA03umT96VRE4D1YczB2lp9yujx0rIKK6YYUszePmGWGImgB9S1Lma8EYPNnID9zKaQoc/gz3p3KZTkWulaOQ8jpvDpoUv3sF4HO3DAiIdz4DTtVP17rDmsKz9HdJ0MGFgSsx8ffTcuhEQkgZN49g60kDwYAON9TaTSK7GZzI3zJ7l80kYWSU2h50V0ulALrB8WBi87Ap1vIIIHxcKEtivfwqgzrWFbLQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.11.83) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 01RLRSWj025795 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Peter, Hobbyists are more likely to spend $50 on a Saleae 16 knockoff rather than = $160 for the Analog Devices unit. I was talking about professional/commerci= al use. Friendly regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Peter = Loron=20 Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 11:45 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: Re: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? I believe saying it is a waste of time is a bit disingenious. While the =93= learning module=94 may not have the specs or support one might want in a to= ol which is used for professional work, it doesn=92t mean the tool is unsui= table for some applications. For those of us who are hobbyists, we may not = have the need or budget to purchase tools like the Saleae units. The Analog= one might be just fine. Understand your needs and what the tool offers, an= d make an informed decision. -Pete > On Feb 27, 2020, at 09:37, Bob Blick wrote: > > Hi Neil, > It's a "Learning Module" that's part of their education series. It's not = a tool, it's a waste of time. > > Saleae has lots of nice logic analyzers, unfortunately their latest offer= ings have prices to match all their cool new features. > > Friendly regards, Bob > > ________________________________________ > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Neil > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 10:25 PM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? > > Anyone using this? https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=3DADALM20= 00 > If so, what are your thoughts on it? Found it when looking for a budget > 16-channel logic analyzer, but seems quite handy otherwise. > > Cheers, > -Neil. > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .