Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:23:37 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01RKF7Jj013849; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:15:13 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01RKF5TQ013846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:15:05 -0500 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01RKHpre000374 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:18:25 -0500 Received: from oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:12:06 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:14:42 -0500 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.103) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:14:42 -0500 Received: from CO2PR05CA0103.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:104:1::29) by CO2PR01MB2150.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:102:8::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.21; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:14:41 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT018.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:104:1:cafe::c8) by CO2PR05CA0103.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:104:1::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2793.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:14:41 +0000 Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (209.85.208.169) by CO1NAM03FT018.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:14:40 +0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o15so669922ljg.6 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:14:40 -0800 (PST) From: Clint Jay To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:14:24 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Topic: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Index: AdXtq8s4OqXgrxkvQnOYetdAH9gBXA== Message-ID: References: <5E5760DE.4080102@narwani.org> <20200227074402.GA17399@laptop.org> <5E57FC57.4050907@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5E57FC57.4050907@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.169 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.169; helo=mail-lj1-f169.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=t33vyWIX5hejKm//DCOnFFkzeHnC7nM2kul96N5eInE=; b=cAW4is2I5WbdvCO+PK5w5F7mRHnW6CgRTZbPcVx7KUtETiB8tZ1Ttpayld30tvKPtj v9N6DkqcdZFUuAVIayCDDlz/pvjW1Kqf80UpqLCNo2RducedUV2fd/mDJmr/D91SdxeW vLag1Bh3gMBUleH7tv0VC8/BbpJKh2fXOuXefw8wX2YC6+YiouYZFPwRmwCCeKIFcYxK kEDgdzEWnjMcEGZwzqH1zwOVllKnthjFm3svTJt7kll0ns899C5IK1KXOrEJjbVB0fFg YVm+oVkVAgL7ExtUiBI5WPSSGi+K+F8NfXlIcp/cQQhAr727qUKBH1bpqLDWrRMVC5mR qfrg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.169) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a2e:9dc3:: with SMTP id x3mr483495ljj.257.1582834478312; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:14:38 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 If that was to me then no, the Hantek is 32 channel, the supplied software is alright but I'm used to Pulseview so used that rather than learn a new package for a borrowed tool. Have to disagree with Bob (A rare happening), the AD units aren't a full fledged piece of lab kit but do offer a lot of functionality for the price and are a useful addition to a hoddyist's bench, however if you already have test gear with overlapping functionality then you may be better investing in better, single purpose kit. On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, 17:29 Neil, wrote: > Is this 16-channel? > I'm mostly using 3.3V nowadays though. > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > > > On 2/27/2020 5:54 AM, Clint Jay wrote: > > I have one of the cheap FX2 logic analysers, they're passable as long a= s > > you're working on 5V logic, not so great if it's 3.3V or lower. > > > > I borrowed a Hantek 4032L which is excellent with Pulseview. > > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, 07:44 James Cameron, wrote: > > > >> I've heard good things about the Analog Discovery range, but haven't > >> used it myself. > >> > >> I have used an eight-channel device, similar to these two; > >> > >> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/15033 > >> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000257258147.html > >> > >> ... with the PulseView software, following a talk at linux.conf.au > >> 2018 on Signal Analysis with Open Source Logic Analysers. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:25:34AM -0500, Neil wrote: > >>> Anyone using this? > >> https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=3DADALM2000 > >>> If so, what are your thoughts on it? Found it when looking for a > budget > >>> 16-channel logic analyzer, but seems quite handy otherwise. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> -Neil. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >>> View/change your membership options at > >>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> -- > >> James Cameron > >> http://quozl.netrek.org/ > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .