From: Clint Jay <cjaysharp@gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:54:03 -0800
Subject: Re: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool?
Thread-Topic: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool?
Thread-Index: AdXtXZ7K83UW4CVeQj66ywhZzNNpPA==
Message-ID:
 <CAN7ULzTQeQ1n95KyaQDhMJfp_m6Erw12mCkdBWAVWNtOEhVxEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5E5760DE.4080102@narwani.org>
 <20200227074402.GA17399@laptop.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200227074402.GA17399@laptop.org>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates
	209.85.208.174 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
	client-ip=209.85.208.174; helo=mail-lj1-f174.google.com;
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
 s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=bssdXLM7syCASNPcr0vTTxHt7/v5FYkGwY7Qtgg0loE=;
	b=DJBwzhvP828ueeK82beiCM1AoGvJL/oqVUe+XVynIhFoIBwRRooGMCqWyMRg1kOVGO
	NNSzXCgeZzc6UOnZ56Am2S4m2MzP/eJoIGLuCwQUv1NwA+i0eSAVx2+w0GH+mbB4DYGb
	OlHyRVSzDjHxs/5b+19VKb78fVmM3Cgr/tAvzf62NhS7XDySoxQnjzTSdTSrF3jGJDN/
	/19YjLI61brEzQdTK1aF+tM+mBvvFOuEfGvbwLGx2P4tMqRCMOW9ooZDpkg0Q0F9rTEe
	H5XNub3dhskudy+AvwsI5vmcoaYZD3+E7C6W0pTR6FR+NAggv7T2cNE0qGHrjLJN41ny	wMHw==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.174)
	smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none
	header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a2e:2e11:: with SMTP id
 u17mr2383608lju.117.1582800856902; 	Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:54:16 -0800 (PST)
x-topics: [EE]
x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I have one of the cheap FX2 logic analysers, they're passable as long as
you're working on 5V logic, not so great if it's 3.3V or lower.

I borrowed a Hantek 4032L which is excellent with Pulseview.

On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, 07:44 James Cameron, <quozl@laptop.org> wrote:

> I've heard good things about the Analog Discovery range, but haven't
> used it myself.
>
> I have used an eight-channel device, similar to these two;
>
> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/15033
> https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000257258147.html
>
> ... with the PulseView software, following a talk at linux.conf.au
> 2018 on Signal Analysis with Open Source Logic Analysers.
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:25:34AM -0500, Neil wrote:
> > Anyone using this?
> https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=3DADALM2000
> > If so, what are your thoughts on it?  Found it when looking for a budge=
t
> > 16-channel logic analyzer, but seems quite handy otherwise.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Neil.
> >
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > View/change your membership options at
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.