Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:53:02 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01R7iEoV008077; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:44:24 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01R7iCnX008074 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:44:13 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01R7hxpd010504 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:43:59 -0500 Received: from oc11expo15.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.20) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:43:44 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo15.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:44:12 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.101) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 02:44:11 -0500 Received: from DM6PR06CA0069.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:54::46) by BL0PR01MB4387.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:8b::16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.17; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:44:09 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT053.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:54:cafe::42) by DM6PR06CA0069.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:54::46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:44:09 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com (209.85.210.175) by DM3NAM03FT053.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.14 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 07:44:08 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id i19so1189065pfa.2 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from esk ([1.144.243.81]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u11sm5252621pjn.2.2020.02.26.23.44.06 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from james by esk with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Dpy-0004dc-7B; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:44:02 +1100 From: James Cameron To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:44:02 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Topic: [EE] Thoughts on this test tool? Thread-Index: AdXtQvA6NgXGAacrS5+3p+pRywH8tg== Message-ID: <20200227074402.GA17399@laptop.org> References: <5E5760DE.4080102@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5E5760DE.4080102@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of laptop.org designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.210.175; helo=mail-pf1-f175.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=laptop-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=NjjIkoKJBdE07n/5soRH2hgB8YSaMKPsmMn2MyWPZbM=; b=w3HEVRBhot/o+vu/NtQKwXNwfI7K4SnGG0LuXipikHhJ3S8wkRekwB1rKyopiTB+CI hiGfmA1eMq1NRBu18ZetIda+vKgTcGCKmE/bKTXIGP+ze51Dg8cjQ66jcpel9SmWOdb3 hbDP0ws/geZWJCBzTZp8FgqPY9wSGPMeyUq1DcFyj9Hjxq3KLB/1DVwPhEjmOz38aWMi T4DH+0Vah4s1YIUY5elVOTjudPs5vpUpKt7BMhu0N/LCBgmewtbd6A2tLGPvjEKcgstv ArAHBcuf3GKu5GsAUe7CIUQRyG08ij58C0OM6oBFpJCeBuU+I0/IN7kJedbYksHogVH4 jR4Q== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.210.175) smtp.mailfrom=laptop.org; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=laptop-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=laptop.org;compauth=pass reason=109 user-agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a63:1e44:: with SMTP id p4mr2860308pgm.367.1582789447710; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:44:07 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 I've heard good things about the Analog Discovery range, but haven't used it myself. I have used an eight-channel device, similar to these two; https://www.sparkfun.com/products/15033 https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000257258147.html .... with the PulseView software, following a talk at linux.conf.au 2018 on Signal Analysis with Open Source Logic Analysers. On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 01:25:34AM -0500, Neil wrote: > Anyone using this? https://www.digikey.com/products/en?keywords=3DADALM20= 00 > If so, what are your thoughts on it? Found it when looking for a budget= =20 > 16-channel logic analyzer, but seems quite handy otherwise. >=20 > Cheers, > -Neil. >=20 > --=20 > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .