Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:07:45 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01MI066v000991; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:00:06 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01MI051s000988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:00:05 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01MI3JwT003048 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:03:19 -0500 Received: from w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:59:46 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by w92expo19.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:00:04 -0500 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.109) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 13:00:04 -0500 Received: from BL0PR0102CA0019.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::32) by CH2PR01MB6007.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:610:47::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.17; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:00:03 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT015.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::203) by BL0PR0102CA0019.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:207:18::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:00:03 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-f45.google.com (209.85.161.45) by DM3NAM03FT015.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.195) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 18:00:02 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-f45.google.com with SMTP id l5so3187816ywd.4 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:00:02 -0800 (PST) From: Manu Abraham To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:59:55 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Simulating a push pull converter Thread-Topic: [EE] Simulating a push pull converter Thread-Index: AdXpqvvjzsJBAQjbQkGWGLaXB6hu8g== Message-ID: References: <91EC4BD7-5D57-4FAF-8B4E-A1E30C2505EE@gmail.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <91EC4BD7-5D57-4FAF-8B4E-A1E30C2505EE@gmail.com> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.161.45; helo=mail-yw1-f45.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Mvp4sjJNhXXETMue2CGe3YPXffEvf0teWO6WR72BWwg=; b=FHRBNdXwLez5yHRQMOSfL9Bva0ynSGGecjKgCG0pxnHWOQc9FLek02/1aplv7v6s7D 6gUGv/h3HzMNoNepPhViwVLGSxdeweAMjL8caTJN9NgpZb9Bkr3ZeMIEL8l6mJaZeVve JO+UmvWFltmYBgDi4Hgq3jsJhS+OhYNAFE/OUo7TpiK9fNqu2j5aQklVriDv3aeEYJNB C9NIPvYJYVEL+Ce5X+3K6QsitzpDjUMshR3GSVVKbMlLNSKedrWbFwBtyVhcjzy092vC kR4F4dtRh8YxflTw2AfVxld4GKq/olRtj52sSjGoyQ4NMOfv4MkKu5ATrzD1gh9uFVy7 A/ew== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.161.45) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a81:10a:: with SMTP id 10mr39094536ywb.440.1582394401940; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 10:00:01 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Veronica, Reducing the secondary inductance implies reducing the secondary turns ratio. Which implies reducing the overall secondary voltage. I guess that's what you meant rather than the assymetricity ? Cheers, Manu On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 8:36 PM Veronica Merryfield wrote: > > Try reducing the output inductance. > > > On Feb 22, 2020, at 5:17 AM, Manu Abraham wrot= e: > > > > Hi, > > > > Simulating a push pull converter in LTSpice, I get an asymmetric output= swing. > > > > Any thoughts, why the swing is asymmetric ? > > > > Thanks, > > Manu > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .