From: Manu Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:57:43 -0800
Subject: Re: [EE] Simulating a push pull converter
Thread-Topic: [EE] Simulating a push pull converter
Thread-Index: AdXpqtT2anOTnqmrRHmJjfpKIx7T6Q==
Message-ID:
 <CAHFNz9Kx2FuW6JH=NSfBjiE46GYAC6UMdSae+kdiSe9P0TmsWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAHFNz9K2LbpKhdrxBC16G0F=6cDwnnOSwGfgwTpuzCckWv1pqQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BYAPR02MB4055FC1FA85B8F331C524C8EDCEE0@BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
 <BYAPR02MB4055FC1FA85B8F331C524C8EDCEE0@BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates
	209.85.219.174 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
	client-ip=209.85.219.174; helo=mail-yb1-f174.google.com;
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
 s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=UBpHQ1lZ+4L5tMUm070TVfxBHAW1cf+dXpH7MRn6ebg=;
	b=akVtBHU1FAFoQKz+ECiPtmLRXK67DTwye7JISBBeVwnxoT2vJCdRPvkkMhthzpM6mp
	Gya8oNXwNbbL8FLElb8HExEpwz205PurFW7/PrM+SXMN/Amxi3BKMjQhyO6MW73D5bHp
	8dtD/Rt5zZWRV4Le2ZUwAXdBawNEW3Nzu0FH1C2wwkY44uNqz8Q+Oa4NnYFqHNeVQFqT
	DfDtkmhLXewC+CwkkHw4vOpDVDHjRjmHMIpkH9jOZg+J+rYaSJ+T/BYtmUUhJD+fDerT
	JuOzlf7zcSAwnOUl8hPDCuW/IpPXC+CYRcS2JAKL8WWwrjWCVbEFsD8/92OWppZRZEtT	oZ4Q==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.219.174)
	smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none
	header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a25:b84e:: with SMTP id b14mr89374ybm.200.1582394270290;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2020 09:57:50 -0800 (PST)
x-topics: [EE]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Greetings Bob,

Adding in Rise and Fall time improved the symmetricity of the
waveform, though negligible, but there still exists a small difference
-421V vs 431V.
If it were a practical scenario, it could be assumed that it were the
magnetization current. But does LTSpice know about magnetization
current in this situation ?

Cheers,

Manu

On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:54 PM Bob Blick <bobblick@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Greetings Manu,
>
> LTSpice always needs to have a rise and fall time specified for all pulse=
 sources. Make them some tiny value, say 0.01u and everything works fine.
>
> Cheerful regards, Bob
>
> ________________________________________
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu <piclist-bounces@mit.edu> on behalf of Manu=
 Abraham <abraham.manu@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:17 AM
> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> Subject: [EE] Simulating a push pull converter
>
> Hi,
>
> Simulating a push pull converter in LTSpice, I get an asymmetric output s=
wing.
>
> Any thoughts, why the swing is asymmetric ?
>
> Thanks,
> Manu
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.