From: "Forrest Christian (List Account)" <lists@packetflux.com>
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" <piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:34:47 -0800
Subject: Re: [PIC] pricing on oldies and the future of the 18 pin PIC
Thread-Topic: [PIC] pricing on oldies and the future of the 18 pin PIC
Thread-Index: AdXnCSoycMOVCX0KR1a+YL9pMtr4bw==
Message-ID:
 <CAKsZx=2m+9kCPSp2gotUn1yjtDcb+o3F_fdsomvxThFcyWB8tg@mail.gmail.com>
References:
 <CAOf6Maw80PA9u_3UdOFbeAGegHKSuXyGtzUuAp1XB7Lggrku5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
 <CAOf6Maw80PA9u_3UdOFbeAGegHKSuXyGtzUuAp1XB7Lggrku5g@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. <piclist@mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of packetflux.com
	designates 209.85.208.177 as permitted sender)
	receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.177;
	helo=mail-lj1-f177.google.com;
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=packetflux-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 	bh=AYAUWDfQ/PeuDIKz0iFHQ7UU3RO2oSgyE5M7TV6a9sA=;
	b=ETVZW1gQiM/uPorcfxcA4q8wrM+A/PFxwOpkZYU7DdLVrtwsI4uadsYWEM7S/dtz9C
	N6MfMVSUkDhvV4EzKXvnh/xfEMJky0/yMFB9Ry7SmvPPgR1giKDWCbnjLJb3rqB0m5Fj
	0UwK7nmgFdp5bWsYxhrO4KDLhlXfTkDNJ1gWXXbWJcufsnD92OJQpkUsgsTlrvS2TBcz
	2mLBId1ijROBmWRTV6jZkT5Bw1Aj9j3kuI4WL6FqPncISCvdja7cqNmv+LjM69bY6V/4
	YPyW27Pf1u05FxbrFCzckFRdh8PLxEPJ+EDPyG8BwrYihZh6huvQAxrSZYBMQ+tc60ZH	Gpaw==
authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.177)
	smtp.mailfrom=packetflux.com; mit.edu;	dkim=pass (signature was verified)
	header.d=packetflux-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu;	dmarc=bestguesspass
	action=none header.from=packetflux.com;compauth=pass reason=109
errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu
list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist.mit.edu>
list-post: <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu
x-mailman-version: 2.1.6
x-received: by 2002:a2e:22c5:: with SMTP id
 i188mr15736791lji.34.1582104897278;	Wed, 19 Feb 2020 01:34:57 -0800 (PST)
x-topics: [PIC]
x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Let me save you $0.20 on singles...  And $0.35 on 100's.

https://www.microchipdirect.com/product/search/all/16F627a-i%2Fp



On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:00 AM Chuck Olson <wb9kzy@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I'm looking at the 16F1826 and at least the comparator should be
> > identical.   There's some nomenclature difference, but comparator 1 has
> the
> > same inputs and outputs.  Was there something specific which didn't wor=
k?
>
> Forrest -
>
> I don't remember the particulars, this was from maybe 10 years ago.
> But I just couldn't setup the comparator the same way, the config
> table for the 16f627/8 had a combination that I used but which didn't
> exist on the newer part.
>
> > But...   The cost of a 16f18260I/P is $1.43/singles and $1.09/1000PCS.
> > The PIC16F627A-I/P is $1.63/singles and $1.44/1000PCS.
>
> The price of the 16F627a-i/p-nd is $1.86 for any quantity at Digikey
> but you are right, it's hard to justify a part change based on price
> alone.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Chuck Olson, WB9KZY
> Jackson Harbor Press
> --
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>


--=20
- Forrest
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.