Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:33:42 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01CJKLf4003337; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:22:58 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 01CJKKRB003333 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:20:21 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 01CJJcJF010731 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:19:49 -0500 Received: from oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:19:55 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) by oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:19:55 -0500 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.175) by oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:19:55 -0500 Received: from BL0PR0102CA0010.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::23) by BL0PR0102MB3425.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:1c::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:19:53 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT003.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::208) by BL0PR0102CA0010.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:207:18::23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:19:53 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com (209.85.208.42) by DM3NAM03FT003.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2729.22 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:19:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id c26so3716662eds.8 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:19:52 -0800 (PST) From: Ryan O'Connor To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:19:40 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] TL431+NPN as rated series regulator? Circuit questions. Thread-Topic: [EE] TL431+NPN as rated series regulator? Circuit questions. Thread-Index: AdXh21Wc2GRRTeX2RB6vPX3LuvGYQg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.42 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.42; helo=mail-ed1-f42.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aAHp8fSzvs9OklM4ZmkYQsd9bEi46oMpTZQdylc3o0Q=; b=OzHyKFNFbstj3igdQh+JB6ekNjp7ST/VuCmvEYuZqWW8CHSbrfbV03AT5nZqlcKgpI jJSJr4enotOcJ5o+Vwm2GiAuUN1O9G34vL6W3qkZXN8WTYnP2KQzaC+/nQH5G8hmuB8H IPZamdm2pcPy64JzjgNjHsIEzE5M8xUXcUY76+S8HF2Ybr/mAy5rTiudeSVtE5KFfNBI ToXTl6OdI+nv+SbDMUNbYoXknn1oUvGVS2zCpzhGZ50TOfP+ozoxqLA0YwVm3S/NnRks 2L1JlDcihGRPN4L4cBR80xdZprVG66y/XcJuDAhi3GXr+Esx0dKadQnLx/J5n2eZ9MbU S/9Q== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.42) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aa7:d3cb:: with SMTP id o11mr12050966edr.145.1581535191282; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:19:51 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks for that Bob! What you explain makes sense when you consider it might be driving an inductive load? It would also explain why I have seen C1 not installed before for basic loads. Ryan On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 7:49 AM, Bob Blick wrote: > Hi Jason, > RB pinches off the base of the final transistor and makes the Darlington > configuration faster and more linear. RA is called a base stopper and > destroys the Q of what could otherwise be a resonant circuit due to > combination of the output load on the regulator, interelectrode > capacitances in the transistors, and the output gain. Emitter followers a= re > quite susceptible to oscillation. C1 adds local feedback to the TL431 to > reduce its gain long before the phase shift of the output transistors can > cause a positive feedback situation. > Basically, those three components all are there to give stability. > Depending on the type of load, they may not be needed. The TL431 by itsel= f > is a pretty slow device, but the writers of the app note probably wanted = to > protect against a worst-case scenario. > BTW, there are lots of TL431 variations from different manufacturers. Jus= t > because it's marked TL431 doesn't mean it is anything like one from TI. > Including the pinout :) > Friendly regards, Bob > > ________________________________________ > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of > Jason White > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 9:30 AM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: [EE] TL431+NPN as rated series regulator? Circuit questions. > > Hello everyone, > > The TL431 datasheet shows the attached circuit has an example of how > to create a series regulator. > > I would like some help understanding the purpose of C1, RA, and RB. > > I assume RA is to prevent oscillation? > What is C1's purpose? Why is C1 from cathode to reference? (to prevent > oscillation?) > What is RB's purpose? (to improve turn off time?) > > -- > Jason White > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .