Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 03:30:39 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.MIT.EDU (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 017BGBlu026688; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:21:24 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.MIT.EDU (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 017BGAqh026685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:16:11 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 017BJ8Oa019922 for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:19:08 -0500 Received: from oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:15:27 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11expo14.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:16:10 -0500 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.101) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 06:16:09 -0500 Received: from BL0PR0102CA0013.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::26) by DM6PR01MB3833.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:5:83::14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:16:09 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT029.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::201) by BL0PR0102CA0013.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:207:18::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:16:08 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (209.85.167.48) by CO1NAM03FT029.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:16:08 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 9so1260286lfq.10 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 03:16:08 -0800 (PST) From: Alan Pearce To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 03:15:54 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Topic: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Index: AdXdqgbSoDQRS3ZlQMGq3alUx35bMA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of googlemail.com designates 209.85.167.48 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.48; helo=mail-lf1-f48.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6X9Eybzkvw9dHQGvTMdlNaLvUQqw1Ls519M/E1T5/MM=; b=vR0rGrCo0L/whSLMFBsiwjj+LanSOgx1QrFg0BCxWJhQ5kWKZ3CRQ0XY+kreYV117m 3XIPLu3tTPJMPdx/8Ba+JzgcEVDy8RdELCSEx/iJWYmPB7JHpqqkU0DEACzJ8MOPvb9c lpFOux4v0LmVCjGqjj+T4Bgt4ia3Y99jWSxjCxtPcibgDu/TtfIr01FxvugQHjoChrS5 aDn4kDT+iTcerlMKT8GUd11x/2Hq361GxeC4HZeF1Z0rzcxovGJdAMBwHetC95hUwAhk W5IdKrc8D1vWELfwugmSGkISpZtAdby8Sy6Kunb6AiPO+1nKz7neyvNY4nQdjxvohfWK gS9w== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.48) smtp.mailfrom=googlemail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=googlemail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=googlemail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:ac2:54b5:: with SMTP id w21mr4315051lfk.175.1581074166052; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 03:16:06 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.MIT.EDU id 017BGAqh026685 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 For that use I would look at getting several resistors designed for current monitoring in motor drivers and putting them in series. I'm thinking something along this style (although this one is too low in va= lue) https://uk.farnell.com/tt-electronics-welwyn/oars-xp-0r01/current-sense-res= -0r01-5-3-5-w/dp/1292588 You could possibly make something suitable yourself if needed. Do you really need a full ohm? Here is one three times the value of the one above (picture is representati= ve) https://uk.farnell.com/tt-electronics-welwyn/oars1-r050fi/current-sense-res= -0r05-1-2-w-smd/dp/1200356 On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 17:16, Jason White wrote: > > Thanks David, > > I have decided against doing it - fireproofness definitely trumps most > of my other concerns. Embarrassingly, I missed that fact that pulse > rated SMT resistor families like D/CRCW-IF e3 exist. If I use a pulse > rated resistor and make a few design compromises my problems are > solved. > > Thanks everyone! > -Jason White > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:03 PM David Van Horn > wrote: > > > > The conductive debris can also lead to ignition of the PCB. > > I wouldn't ever do this, after reading "Low voltage, the incompetent ig= nition source". > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu On Behalf Of Bo= b Blick > > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 9:40 AM > > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > > Subject: Re: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625= W) for 1ms? > > > > Hi Jason, > > Look for fusing currents of PCB traces, there are a couple of good pape= rs about it on the web. Also there are calculators for the resistances. > > > > But using copper for a resistor, especially PCB traces, is only useful = if tolerance is ignored. PCB copper thickness variation between vendor and = batches aside, the thermal coefficient of copper is pretty huge. Plus you a= re going to have a huge temperature jump unless you make the board very lar= ge to accommodate the width and length you'd need for something approaching= a safe, non-fusing value. > > > > That said, give it a try. After all, I once used stainless bicycle spok= es as current shunts. It sorta worked on the bench. > > > > Friendly regards, Bob > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Ja= son White > > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:15 AM > > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > > Subject: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) f= or 1ms? > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > The Vishay D/CRCW e3 SMT resistor family spec. says that one of their > > 1 ohm 2512 resistors is rated to withstand a 1ms pulse of 40W (6.32 > > amps) 8000 times. I have an application when I need to push a bit more = than 25 amps through a 1 ohm resistor for 1ms which is a roughly 625W pulse= .. Low duty cycle, only needs to survive 1000 times total. > > > > I am looking for a small, lightweight solution that won't affect vibrat= ion testing. Big through hole resistors are frowned upon due to their mass = and height. A TO-220 on its back might be acceptable but they don't seem to= have what it takes power wise. With few other options I am considering usi= ng PCB trace resistance as my 1 ohm resistor. The trouble it is difficult t= o calculate the transient thermal response of a PCB trace on FR-4 material = to determine the required width and length. > > > > Does anyone have any advice about handling this pulse? > > > > -- > > Jason White > > > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/c= hange your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/pi= clist > > > > -- > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > > View/change your membership options at > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > > > > -- > Jason White > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .