Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:27:23 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 016HCUGf011539; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:15:43 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 016HCTwX011536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:12:29 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 016HF97N029067 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:15:26 -0500 Received: from oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:11:55 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11expo21.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:12:16 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.104) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:12:15 -0500 Received: from BYAPR01CA0067.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:94::44) by SN6PR0102MB3536.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:10::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:12:14 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT040.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::203) by BYAPR01CA0067.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a03:94::44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:12:14 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com (209.85.210.41) by DM3NAM03FT040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 17:12:13 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id g64so6160236otb.13 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:12:13 -0800 (PST) From: Jason White To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:11:38 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Topic: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Index: AdXdErHuHbIIiDAIQvScivR+sL15aQ== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.41 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.210.41; helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PiMomWFIwF5Ztmm5YZ/jWU3UZxO+ohtl1FRqsUafZr8=; b=UjYs83mUDux4Pudx/pD3MFigqJ+Vue/6BAe1aOYz47bhggf8vwBC9E8CJrlNIQAX6d pGxpbNKZx6O8arfnmvo4rtxve9hFkHtit3PNwPAa092h89qOEbWHmgjGYXmklGqcmE1m ONDibuuncqELWgicy4kwbc6zIcI6UWirBys1ZAfkcKzn8AeI0vN/tvWAIApmfOiNUXhd mM2aS6XsqqgIJCFO6M7OuV05pKLZLvuS2EOOvfrzflGH0gGLeAsjcY3nrnv894yCHzVe i67kSEkeEexHrjQB52YtLxNQeVSkUQcGDRrCVVktdJPrI6S4l5HNv5haSeUThjFe4EPp Gp7A== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.210.41) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a05:6830:1218:: with SMTP id r24mr31944771otp.144.1581009132768; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:12:12 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 016HCTwX011536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks David, I have decided against doing it - fireproofness definitely trumps most of my other concerns. Embarrassingly, I missed that fact that pulse rated SMT resistor families like D/CRCW-IF e3 exist. If I use a pulse rated resistor and make a few design compromises my problems are solved. Thanks everyone! -Jason White On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:03 PM David Van Horn wrote: > > The conductive debris can also lead to ignition of the PCB. > I wouldn't ever do this, after reading "Low voltage, the incompetent igni= tion source". > > -----Original Message----- > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu On Behalf Of Bob = Blick > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 9:40 AM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: Re: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W)= for 1ms? > > Hi Jason, > Look for fusing currents of PCB traces, there are a couple of good papers= about it on the web. Also there are calculators for the resistances. > > But using copper for a resistor, especially PCB traces, is only useful if= tolerance is ignored. PCB copper thickness variation between vendor and ba= tches aside, the thermal coefficient of copper is pretty huge. Plus you are= going to have a huge temperature jump unless you make the board very large= to accommodate the width and length you'd need for something approaching a= safe, non-fusing value. > > That said, give it a try. After all, I once used stainless bicycle spokes= as current shunts. It sorta worked on the bench. > > Friendly regards, Bob > > ________________________________________ > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Jaso= n White > Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 8:15 AM > To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. > Subject: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for= 1ms? > > Hello everyone, > > The Vishay D/CRCW e3 SMT resistor family spec. says that one of their > 1 ohm 2512 resistors is rated to withstand a 1ms pulse of 40W (6.32 > amps) 8000 times. I have an application when I need to push a bit more th= an 25 amps through a 1 ohm resistor for 1ms which is a roughly 625W pulse. = Low duty cycle, only needs to survive 1000 times total. > > I am looking for a small, lightweight solution that won't affect vibratio= n testing. Big through hole resistors are frowned upon due to their mass an= d height. A TO-220 on its back might be acceptable but they don't seem to h= ave what it takes power wise. With few other options I am considering using= PCB trace resistance as my 1 ohm resistor. The trouble it is difficult to = calculate the transient thermal response of a PCB trace on FR-4 material to= determine the required width and length. > > Does anyone have any advice about handling this pulse? > > -- > Jason White > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/cha= nge your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/picl= ist > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 Jason White --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .