Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 08:28:40 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 016GFnjw000825; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:19:13 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 016GFmFO000822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:15:48 -0500 Received: from OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.21]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 016GFcXQ001779 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:15:38 -0500 Received: from w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) by OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (18.9.3.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:15:39 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by w92exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:15:47 -0500 Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.58.103) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:15:47 -0500 Received: from BYAPR01CA0009.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::22) by SN6PR01MB5101.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:ba::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.32; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:15:46 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT050.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::207) by BYAPR01CA0009.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:15:46 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f182.google.com (209.85.167.182) by DM3NAM03FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2707.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:15:45 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f182.google.com with SMTP id c16so5148797oic.3 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:15:45 -0800 (PST) From: Jason White To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 08:15:10 -0800 Subject: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Topic: [EE] PCB trace as a 1 Ohm resistor, Peak pulse 25amps (625W) for 1ms? Thread-Index: AdXdCn4oRWJwyqyBRGiJkBzUm218uw== Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.167.182 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.167.182; helo=mail-oi1-f182.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YDr3HoWyQxdL4V7fwrxcUDXBO+lctvsqxlx9bYsUZJ0=; b=qOhkViYEfRAG9PgyFoCE4getY7t+lVPubMDyPHYDoeJd8zrnXMjm2LoUPJMQo07wXB 2LuBa79EyJxd/6CnvINsq8cPMImgpNwTGfXG3usCrnuqinWORPdFs88IZUjz2o8RHypj 920Rn/gc0CorXmt7V1I93+KJEZs/9FFnabkuEB5VR8DgcICR4G06ygs9Xm288idyAl7I QwJPk2Lcvs/UOuODWf8a/HKvV1J8gtDUsMWk8NZApHgzjW/AWvi7iBNS3mE0QkDSohzF 8dbEkF2//5WLza6GuRATPURuSpoE0/a0Ws25on6W4wDcwaTYgMxbanWc4YFgxSQQD0za QYCA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.167.182) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aca:5150:: with SMTP id f77mr7274303oib.52.1581005745004; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:15:45 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello everyone, The Vishay D/CRCW e3 SMT resistor family spec. says that one of their 1 ohm 2512 resistors is rated to withstand a 1ms pulse of 40W (6.32 amps) 8000 times. I have an application when I need to push a bit more than 25 amps through a 1 ohm resistor for 1ms which is a roughly 625W pulse. Low duty cycle, only needs to survive 1000 times total. I am looking for a small, lightweight solution that won't affect vibration testing. Big through hole resistors are frowned upon due to their mass and height. A TO-220 on its back might be acceptable but they don't seem to have what it takes power wise. With few other options I am considering using PCB trace resistance as my 1 ohm resistor. The trouble it is difficult to calculate the transient thermal response of a PCB trace on FR-4 material to determine the required width and length. Does anyone have any advice about handling this pulse? --=20 Jason White --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .