Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 17:43:30 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0141WBLg012901; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:34:35 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 0141WAsn012898 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:32:10 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE2.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.18]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0141VYIv016685 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:31:42 -0500 Received: from oc11expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.13) by oc11exedge2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:31:50 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by oc11expo8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:32:08 -0500 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.45.58) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 20:32:08 -0500 Received: from BYAPR01CA0029.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::42) by BN7PR01MB3890.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:406:8c::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.29; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:32:04 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT050.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::209) by BYAPR01CA0029.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a02:80::42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.29 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:32:03 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (209.85.208.50) by CO1NAM03FT050.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2686.26 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 4 Feb 2020 01:32:03 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id m8so18088425edi.13 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:32:03 -0800 (PST) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 17:31:23 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Power transmission Thread-Topic: [EE] Power transmission Thread-Index: AdXa/IEkwx0PgeFtSCqtj0AC2ldsdw== Message-ID: References: <5E38A14C.8050802@narwani.org> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: <5E38A14C.8050802@narwani.org> Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.50 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.50; helo=mail-ed1-f50.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=foFNuBM+NW7XaQTl/SZk5yeZkggtjNL9GzDV8PDyNOw=; b=LGL9J3WASY+CFeA21nudHgS9slYotwE7NXlgEghdDXwVW/ZsjIjYPvqMTLwRjud2Yw wkg+ThzJb9wV+YrgSNoO+ZkTadF5X/e4lSJKBllPx31fU3Z7ujIpLVq9tFJqs/cR9Asm xsrSiae0cgxh4/4Hf/XDjB89V7GZc+y5qIfgvDiqs0eTkDfjOlzbSJSiBGTbY2HJHgFs r7UOYZlJd3wSipQl1zA5X8LM7x7svVFM/vxxJbGUIN41hMs23nyHieey7leSTwOmJbL5 g2JDv6vTHarYDl99D4Za9ssYVPLiGt9DNmTq+0F/UROlmGogXYgmWZdr74+4/q6x/rCu N/5g== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.50) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:4a12:: with SMTP id w18mr23883170eju.321.1580779921005; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:32:01 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 How much power? What distance between TX:RX? What limitations on dimensions of send and receive units? Any cost factors? Why is a hole unacceptable? What are the materials used at and near the power transmission site? (eg are the wall panels made of mumetal?, ...? ) Any other relevant stuff? Russell On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 11:43, Neil wrote: > I'm tinkering with power transmission for getting power from behind a > wall panel to in front. For now I'm just experimenting with the idea, > but I can't find much info on the relationship between coil diameter, > wire diameter, number of turns, frequency, and distance. > Anyone here know anything about this? > > Cheers, > -Neil. > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .