Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 02:03:53 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00T9pBKK005315; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:53:23 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00T9pAL0005311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:51:10 -0500 Received: from W92EXEDGE5.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (W92EXEDGE5.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.22]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00T9oiEt000728 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:50:45 -0500 Received: from w92exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.74) by W92EXEDGE5.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (18.7.73.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:50:41 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by w92exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:51:09 -0500 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.45.57) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:51:08 -0500 Received: from MWHPR01CA0032.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) by MWHPR01MB3230.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:fa::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.24; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:51:06 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT055.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::200) by MWHPR01CA0032.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.24 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:51:06 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (209.85.208.52) by DM3NAM03FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.18 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:51:05 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id c26so17939555eds.8 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:51:05 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:50:52 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] H-Bridge supply voltage spike only in "reverse" (not forward) Thread-Topic: [EE] H-Bridge supply voltage spike only in "reverse" (not forward) Thread-Index: AdXWi2mosoQqceZhTTyROye5RkD9HA== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.52 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.52; helo=mail-ed1-f52.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lk8gosrRSImGJPctWvp1J5oUQkvl3422l1FHH53HoKA=; b=Z2XpLbWBFnudjGeS8sW3BKg53WY/obphKpatxnChruhM1KIwGcVGsa7S8q/rWFdi85 ZBhwIFJgb3GciVOk7kQqepzuNOKAQzW/ohFhLP/AT/QxA8Xo5dGmE4L1DquWqkOhtvnI sC+E5d/C/EcfOTe3Rt37NEdJU+0Bgd0DIKZUcxZvI/MIdPPWxyzFLoCcQZEKwZJrRHm9 6xxlMgNdzWo+08QyKfyFuq3YUzcXYIhOX7JAJRcsRUsGMBi5qjdo4Kqpwqw+42ygvRvT mLoJBRim7bSmksi7okI35Jijgsi9faq63utTrd9B2WR6yaL4jVhZsfbGSaO/AnXgYwrx 6Rsw== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.52) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:907:104e:: with SMTP id oy14mr6749929ejb.82.1580291464257; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:51:04 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Thanks for the update. Glad it worked out! On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 4:35 AM Jason White < whitewaterssoftwareinfo@gmail.com> wrote: > As it turns out it was an almost purely measurement induced phenomena. Th= e > scope earth ground was interacting with the isolated bench power supply > earth ground. Switching to an isolated probe fixed the problem - made the > H-bridge behave as expected with nice square output and a flat unregulate= d > supply rail (except for the 50ns or so of shoot through that I expect to > address in a later revision.) Although I should add that I did insert a 1= uf > capacitor across the bridge and shunt resistor to absorb a brief and smal= l > spike in rail voltage observed every pwm cycle - perhaps due to power > supply lead inductance on my test setup. > > Thanks to everyone for all the help. Things get pretty tricky when > measurements influence circuit operation. > > -Jason White > > On Tuesday, January 28, 2020, Sean Breheny wrote: > > > Any update? I'm really curious. > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020, 10:32 PM Sean Breheny > > > > I agree - beware that power supplies which are isolated from earth > ground > > > may still have substantial capacitance to ground which can affect > > circuits > > > when you ground one of the nodes in the circuit. > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 5:58 PM Jason White < > > > whitewaterssoftwareinfo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Isolated differential probe for Vunregulated and "directly connected= " > > >> for PWM pulses out of H-Bridge. Power supply is isolated from earth > > >> ground. > > >> > > >> I suppose I should try just the differential probe. > > >> > > >> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 5:22 PM Sean Breheny > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > How are you measuring the voltage across the H-bridge? Are you > using > > a > > >> > differential probe? If not, where is the probe GND connected? > > > > > -- > Jason White > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .