Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:51:07 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00NLTPu3010940; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:32:18 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00NLTOKE010935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:29:24 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00NLT1fx027458 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:29:01 -0500 Received: from oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:28:51 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) by oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:28:53 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.104) by oc11exhyb3.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:28:53 -0500 Received: from BYAPR01CA0049.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:a03:94::26) by SN6PR01MB5039.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:be::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.19; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:52 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT042.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::208) by BYAPR01CA0049.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:a03:94::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:51 +0000 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.10.49) by CO1NAM03FT042.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:51 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM04FT010.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.51) by CO1NAM04HT182.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.18; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:50 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.90.60) by CO1NAM04FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.18 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:50 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f964:6ae7:834b:8fa7]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f964:6ae7:834b:8fa7%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.027; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 21:28:50 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:28:50 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] H-Bridge supply voltage spike only in "reverse" (not forward) Thread-Topic: [EE] H-Bridge supply voltage spike only in "reverse" (not forward) Thread-Index: AQHV0iHPVccwQ7NbD0q1QpbMQeQtrKf4wmkn Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.10.49 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.10.49; helo=NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=XLuBNCUxkhmB66O/51HYePTOwlJu37+l4sCJSwF7B4A=; b=QGgClbdF3XTOXj5NtL2kAgKQileLjIOqxN9p95uuq1Huo8AWCGFn/SkjJWUIwBzzuZveLEsM7jTP0XKevZAGZ66opmehuBxEi/hDHwhV1gSITVYoFFhAIcu/Kdk3vT6qRHTB0HN9wctYdaClxyCX/zIeblt8uM5X1f1tThswRR4LwC8Fiqhpt8Iw0fW/+QZL4Ky9J3DTwuUWaC5ZpS5unEZaxAdOIRMQu/F2akxfsNfiyeip33KJL1aeRvGowvGxzt9AIYGF3cApFDCjoMXVno6uQZLPTDI1ybdQ/BD7y1Gz39bfHSO333ETW5vcKwIDCcFEzj/4uD7AFZQFe68esA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.10.49) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [EE] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by PCH.mit.edu id 00NLTOKE010935 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Jason, Back-EMF from the motor can pump the supply up. Why it would do it only in = reverse is a bit of a mystery though. Having a big-enough bulk capacitor on= an H-bridge supply is always a requirement when driving an inductive load. Class-D audio power amplifiers also sometimes have the same problem of supp= ly pump-up, depending on the speaker load and program material. Best regards, Bob ________________________________________ From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu on behalf of Jason = White=20 Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 11:04 AM To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [EE] H-Bridge supply voltage spike only in "reverse" (not forward) Hello everyone, I am encountering the following. The supply voltage line to my H-Bridge is rising only when the H-Bridge is running a motor in "reverse." In forward the supply voltage is unaffected. Intuitively I am having trouble understanding why this should be. I lack a decoupling capacitor on the supply line, but do have a zener. I have attached a schematic of the circuit. I will send the forward and reverse waveforms in two follow up emails to avoid hitting the file size attachment limits.The waveforms will show supply voltage and voltage across the H-Bridge. -- Jason White --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .