Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:52:20 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00JNf3bP026221; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:43:26 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00JNf2cU026216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:41:02 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00JNhdZC022331 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:43:40 -0500 Received: from w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:39:20 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) by w92exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.71.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:41:01 -0500 Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.37.54) by oc11exhyb4.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 18:41:01 -0500 Received: from MWHPR01CA0032.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) by SN6PR01MB4303.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:805:a8::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.18; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:40:59 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT064.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::203) by MWHPR01CA0032.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:300:101::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:40:59 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com (209.85.208.48) by CO1NAM03FT064.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 23:40:58 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id t17so27809816eds.6 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:40:58 -0800 (PST) From: Sean Breheny To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:40:44 -0800 Subject: Re: [EE] Magnetic lock Thread-Topic: [EE] Magnetic lock Thread-Index: AdXPI302AmVMGYY7Rpyib+jBJT+WGg== Message-ID: References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.48 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.48; helo=mail-ed1-f48.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cornell.edu; s=g.20171207; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=DEXTTNBD1Q4gMafGNtmSggKzCrGTo379zxiPoj7slbg=; b=nSEYzw0uIDF2UJAQjnZfWOqtCuKy/5zEL3mXZQURYCPhWXC5+NkHLC55pGpdFKhVmt Ik7MGwGRZPE2f9sHGpK1GJbbuVK9kufvvrWpUCTuj3Y9X+1OYUFtxtMeE/PhkDUK+I/9 JoH3CjmryiX7XPuhXj9/6nBUmSZ3tKX0Cx10BRKqCaHR4U9I2nlF6hE+2QQM67256W4c caGvgfCQcd1BWOwbtcvhM2b+OvAYcgi3GN4TLhUiEF5ITS7vST/5Q+weqHPHLVv7/vdk //E0P5O3DueiAWGCVbQrI4PM1sQr0h2+IR4QBltcGn2AtnpFFyd4anaSehWIMSZl6p+D aAsQ== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.48) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=cornell.edu;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cornell.edu;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:a17:906:23e2:: with SMTP id j2mr17872722ejg.257.1579477256785; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:40:56 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Not necessarily - AC solenoids have 120Hz force ripple because as I said the force peaks twice per cycle (it would be different if there were a permanent magnet involved where you could have repulsion). On Sun, Jan 19, 2020, 6:26 PM Dr Skip 120Hz buzz, wouldn't that imply full wave rectified DC? > > -Dr Skip > > > > On January 19, 2020 3:58:00 PM EST, Sean Breheny wrote= : > >I definitely have seen some that are AC (they have an audible 120Hz > >buzz - > >120Hz because they attract more strongly on both positive and negative > >peaks) > > > >On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:36 PM David C Brown > >wrote: > > > >> They are DC > >> __________________________________________ > >> David C Brown > >> 43 Bings Road > >> Whaley Bridge > >> High Peak Phone: 01663 733236 > >> Derbyshire eMail: dcb.home@gmail.com > >> SK23 7ND web: www.bings-knowle.co.uk/dcb > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> *Sent from my etch-a-sketch* > >> > >> > >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2020 at 16:25, Sean Breheny wrote: > >> > >> > If the electromagnet uses AC then it will indeed draw less current > >when > >> it > >> > is closed against the piece of metal it attracts. This is because > >there > >> is > >> > no longer an air gap in the magnetic circuit so the inductance is > >higher. > >> > > >> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 8:43 PM mike brown >> > > >> > > In my experience, the electromagnet appears to draw less current > >when > >> > > latched to the metal plate. This is an unscientific observation > >based > >> > upon > >> > > the temperature of the magnet increasing when not latched to the > >steel > >> > > plate. Amazing that they can generate such a strong holding > >force > >> using > >> > > three watts of power as long as the two parts perfectly mate to > >each > >> > other. > >> > > > >> > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 19:07 Bob Blick > >wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Admin message to Allen, since his email address seems to reject > >> direct > >> > > > email. > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Allen, > >> > > > Please, when you reply to a piclist post, insure that the > >subject > >> line > >> > > > topic tag is not preceded by your own email system's bracketing > >> system, > >> > > > because it does not conform to the piclist topic tag > >definitions and > >> > > > interferes with our archiving system, and also with users that > >rely > >> on > >> > > the > >> > > > topic tag to sort their piclist emails. > >> > > > Thanks. > >> > > > Bob > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list > >archive > >> > > > View/change your membership options at > >> > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > > > >> > > -- > >> > > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> > > View/change your membership options at > >> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > > >> > -- > >> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> > View/change your membership options at > >> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > > >> -- > >> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >> View/change your membership options at > >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > >> > >-- > >http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > >View/change your membership options at > >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .