Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:51:45 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00J1eVoq016764; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:43:06 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-3.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.13]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00J1eUTX016761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:40:30 -0500 Received: from oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (OC11EXEDGE1.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.17]) by outgoing-exchange-3.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00J1e9bO004666 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:40:10 -0500 Received: from w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) by oc11exedge1.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.3.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:40:23 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) by w92expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.74.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:40:29 -0500 Received: from NAM12-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.59.174) by oc11exhyb8.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 20:40:29 -0500 Received: from BL0PR0102CA0030.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:207:18::43) by MN2PR01MB5342.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:10f::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.21; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:40:28 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT053.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::200) by BL0PR0102CA0030.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:207:18::43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:40:27 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com (209.85.167.53) by CO1NAM03FT053.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 01:40:25 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id f24so138521lfh.3 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:40:20 -0800 (PST) From: mike brown To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:39:46 -0800 Subject: Re: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][EE] Magnetic lock Thread-Topic: [CAUTION: Failed DKIM Test][EE] Magnetic lock Thread-Index: AdXOawH3dh7zuNsORdu9AT666Vh7tg== Message-ID: References: <001c01d5ce4b$afa28370$0ee78a50$@amulvey.com> List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: n5qmg.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=n5qmg-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HNB0pwI7JN3WdoO1w5o1XI9Ll28a9Vc9rLTp2USn2Ug=; b=zhBi0PS7CIpGfda1Drel2H1yGayhOOuYRd9i3Ly7YC8nGkhbZW7brjECu8CewHfO3L KBHPG9qGAb9AWiHH4dxV5lz3u8EgQsGPyDAH+KPJvl3e8Vrp1rV4VJgRZXDllZNmG8ny sOxecPmW5m0T9xz4sVu7/fFBYOHx0E++HYI1LULUGnZ1X665z7Njfesv3TzbUHhI+0AK ep6pJtLKQU7Xq89cKTOfrJvgxdQ6KIjL9qathdD2KuU32Rya4d4UBV7Pfl2fbmOiQGWt /nCHFwvwyeZP708A0yeC+qrtfUdYl3XdvChxoLRTw7RquAqVyXTrNYWpX68nmk/7GthL Mk3w== authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 209.85.167.53) smtp.mailfrom=n5qmg.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=n5qmg-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; mit.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=n5qmg.com; errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:ac2:57cc:: with SMTP id k12mr9412249lfo.36.1579397998120; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 17:39:58 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [EE] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 In my experience, the electromagnet appears to draw less current when latched to the metal plate. This is an unscientific observation based upon the temperature of the magnet increasing when not latched to the steel plate. Amazing that they can generate such a strong holding force using three watts of power as long as the two parts perfectly mate to each other. On Sat, Jan 18, 2020, 19:07 Bob Blick wrote: > Admin message to Allen, since his email address seems to reject direct > email. > > Hi Allen, > Please, when you reply to a piclist post, insure that the subject line > topic tag is not preceded by your own email system's bracketing system, > because it does not conform to the piclist topic tag definitions and > interferes with our archiving system, and also with users that rely on th= e > topic tag to sort their piclist emails. > Thanks. > Bob > > -- > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .