Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:14:47 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H32eJ4009653; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:05:22 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-7.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.58]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H32dEh009643 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:39 -0500 Received: from w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.15]) by outgoing-exchange-7.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00H32VI3013258 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:32 -0500 Received: from oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) by w92exedge3.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:01:02 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) by oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:38 -0500 Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.57.176) by oc11exhyb2.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:38 -0500 Received: from SN2PR01CA0072.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:800::40) by DM5PR01MB2620.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:3:ff::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.18; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:02:37 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT014.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::202) by SN2PR01CA0072.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:800::40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.18 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:02:36 +0000 Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (208.85.220.69) by CO1NAM03FT014.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.80.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:02:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65972EAA99 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vbrULPxxsr73 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:57:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from QUADRO.interlog.com (CPE688f2e2f19d3-CM688f2e2f19d0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.246.174.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: speff@interlog.com) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7671C2EAA8C for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:02:34 -0500 (EST) From: Spehro Pefhany To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:02:34 -0800 Subject: Re: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Topic: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Index: AdXM5EYGRfl0Icy7T3GV+3XZnkdnwA== Message-ID: <7.0.0.16.2.20200116215835.106c5f80@interlog.com> References: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of interlog.com designates 208.85.220.69 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=208.85.220.69; helo=mail-1.ca.inter.net; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitprod.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-mitprod-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=H+3xooLfpnKYSrsXGTELhqcWVe7kaZDLnmzERCHjNlc=; b=ndN954E0xcv/LpdOLRsMH+4iizfjWMwloSFTQP+17aISY1kfNDNaQRASsqRvGsY6XU57rKXUJxV3DCmwR7Dggs846kzYkwqW7RjV/uNZIZfVZWReSxrq5AMaNtQa7P6+/369kvGA1hlu14tzjsTpSado0L4YDxiS3trExIdz7wk= authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 208.85.220.69) smtp.mailfrom=interlog.com; mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=interlog.com;compauth=pass reason=109 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 At 07:59 PM 1/16/2020, you wrote: One thought that may make it more worthwhile to import an out-of-market phone is that many offer dual SIM capability (standby or active, depending on the model). That could be really handy if you travel a lot. Here in Canada, none of the carriers offers subsidized phones with dual-SIMs- they want you to buy their expensive roaming services. For more than a few days, I usually buy a SIM locally. Spawn has a Huawei P20 pro and loves it, coming from an iPhone too. --sp=20 --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .