Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:21:05 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H29HYs004302; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:11:50 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.15]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H29FaF004296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:09:15 -0500 Received: from w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (W92EXEDGE4.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.7.73.16]) by outgoing-exchange-1.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00H29ko1018303 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:09:47 -0500 Received: from oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) by w92exedge4.exchange.mit.edu (18.7.73.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1293.2; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:06:58 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) by oc11expo26.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.4.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1365.1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:09:13 -0500 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.70.102) by oc11exhyb7.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:09:13 -0500 Received: from MN2PR01CA0015.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:10c::28) by DM5PR01MB2697.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:3:f3::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:12 +0000 Received: from DM3NAM03FT013.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e49::205) by MN2PR01CA0015.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:208:10c::28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:12 +0000 Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (40.92.40.45) by DM3NAM03FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.79) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:11 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM10FT025.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.13.152.59) by DM6NAM10HT139.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.13.153.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:09 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.13.152.51) by DM6NAM10FT025.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.152.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:09 +0000 Received: from BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f964:6ae7:834b:8fa7]) by BYAPR02MB4055.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f964:6ae7:834b:8fa7%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2644.015; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:09 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2600:380:20e9:4272:dd99:15c5:3f59:1b48] (2600:380:20e9:4272:dd99:15c5:3f59:1b48) by CO2PR04CA0130.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:104:7::32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:09:08 +0000 From: Bob Blick To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:09:09 -0800 Subject: Re: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Topic: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Index: AQHVzNMbCKPF4S2NiEag4EDcRm1zsqfuHImA Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , In-Reply-To: Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: TempError X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of outlook.com designates 40.92.40.45 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=40.92.40.45; helo=NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YR55od2sMYkl9prvbzFnPKdyapGR2gMtn47ho0c2GW8=; b=VjLtHvqj64QNstB11jOOO5RM1DyYP2iS3IdoInyWEI/lPshAfQ2+5L1vPdcuUjKrk6rRyqYXPxQI3X3WGwQvwx4TA1xAPomsFn2LsSJSBszoBbSw5dIjfoHyhhelirW02vRyDhtUafntcFNQoMADSNulMi2xJHqFO8UhEXqOX0ge8HiH2aWJCTX6IySUrO7A1yggEFScBdDZBXN52lrrfT94LtQiaMEOzBcD/eYvRQ+gpV+RJgzvA2hQe9FQSG8lQTAuGNMMzhocBsYO6AdGh3wM352hNwSEHkxBKdNAlXMznRcrNu07Je8DGKyrleJo798cyokjY96MfgBNSzYHIg== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 40.92.40.45) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=outlook.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=outlook.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Russell, Does it support all the frequencies and protocols that you need? All the on= es I've ever seen do not really work in the US, but maybe NZ requirements a= re closer to mainland China defaults. Friendly regards, Bob On Jan 16, 2020 4:59 PM, RussellMc wrote: Any thoughts / experiences / ... re cellphone purchases as below? I don't NEED a phone of tgis spec and would never buy one locally, but thought it may be interesting to try. No. I do not want an iPhone. I'm considering buying a directly imported Chinese sourced cellphone - probably either a Xiaomi or (dread) Huawei. A highish spec phone (64 GB ROM. 6GB RAM, octacore whatever, 4 cameras (3 too many Google says) , decent screen resolution, too big screen, ... more .... wth "international version O/S) sells for slightly over half the equivalent locally sourced units. Probably about $NZ300 ish landed (about $US200ish) Maybe $NZ550 locally. I'd normally not buy a phone for more than $200 locally, if that (my current phone cost me $19 new, works well as a phone, and is hard to use for anything else. Which is fine). Some Huawei's are sold here by retailers - relatively few models. Xiaomis seem to be only on the local auction site with Chinese sourcing. Claimed-functionality/price I'd lean towards a Xiaomi. Note - the aim is not to be convinced that I don't NEED this spec - I know that :-). Claimed warranty from Ali-Express sellers is often 1 year BUT I'd assume that if it failed within a year that a successful warranty claim would be an unlikely bonus. Russell -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .