Received: from PCH.mit.edu (18.7.21.50) by mail.efplus.com (192.168.0.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.485.1; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:12:05 -0800 Received: from PCH.MIT.EDU (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H10cEg027967; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:03:13 -0500 Received: from outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (OUTGOING-EXCHANGE-5.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.59]) by PCH.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.8) with ESMTP id 00H10cjE027961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:00:38 -0500 Received: from OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU [18.9.3.21]) by outgoing-exchange-5.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 00H13C0a031443 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:03:12 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) by OC11EXEDGE3.EXCHANGE.MIT.EDU (18.9.3.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:00:34 -0500 Received: from oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) by oc11exhyb6.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:00:36 -0500 Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.55.101) by oc11exhyb5.exchange.mit.edu (18.9.1.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:00:36 -0500 Received: from BL0PR01CA0007.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:208:71::20) by MWHPR01MB2400.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10b6:300:3e::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:00:35 +0000 Received: from CO1NAM03FT061.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7e48::200) by BL0PR01CA0007.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:208:71::20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.20 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:00:33 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f50.google.com (209.85.208.50) by CO1NAM03FT061.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.81.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2644.19 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:00:32 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-f50.google.com with SMTP id r21so20718848edq.0 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:00:32 -0800 (PST) From: RussellMc To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. CC: ApptechNZ Sender: "piclist-bounces@mit.edu" Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:59:54 -0800 Subject: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Topic: [OT]::Any thoughts on "direct import" Chinese cellphones? Thread-Index: AdXM0yJyNz5MROA3TL2S+9QqEPtW+w== Message-ID: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Reply-To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: TS500.efplus4.local X-MS-Has-Attach: X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SenderIdResult: Pass X-MS-Exchange-Organization-PRD: mit.edu X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: received-spf: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.208.50 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=209.85.208.50; helo=mail-ed1-f50.google.com; dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+NZd7d9M/rGjhodQvQTYLuc6NZzWTeOnsibmAmRcO8c=; b=DWAI7iM0m8v/JPDpDAKhMHKEeuqpgVz4YK08vNfeF0nyvjZbxwMbQXIxYjP1DpXSkI Zkf1EOEivioUmkT1S8g+iyULht6xedAu6zBqQLPGvmCbolGRm6R6sdEcfaIdbxFQbbAB f4ptdmTofMU/qgQf+Nvncs0ZpYwUqEq/BhQZ4GvtYpkHzGZ/bPcWLKC92F80nPOTyIFh WLRR29aF+7R5P4wGedrb7K1GAeyVTuzqlFAAkHyQvyJpGp5lnU+hlftGZ2fjoq1MPd9Q 5OCDignsaTy16L8cc0uD+VNvmVwEqwgW+QVJ5Ljgvr0m41azLJiV8RZjGPM1RQSVoe18 eJKA== authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 209.85.208.50) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; mit.edu; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=gmail.com;mit.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=gmail.com;compauth=pass reason=100 errors-to: piclist-bounces@mit.edu list-id: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." list-post: x-beenthere: piclist@mit.edu x-mailman-version: 2.1.6 x-received: by 2002:aa7:c389:: with SMTP id k9mr1239865edq.63.1579222830807; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:00:30 -0800 (PST) x-topics: [OT] x-content-filtered-by: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Any thoughts / experiences / ... re cellphone purchases as below? I don't NEED a phone of tgis spec and would never buy one locally, but thought it may be interesting to try. No. I do not want an iPhone. I'm considering buying a directly imported Chinese sourced cellphone - probably either a Xiaomi or (dread) Huawei. A highish spec phone (64 GB ROM. 6GB RAM, octacore whatever, 4 cameras (3 too many Google says) , decent screen resolution, too big screen, ... more .... wth "international version O/S) sells for slightly over half the equivalent locally sourced units. Probably about $NZ300 ish landed (about $US200ish) Maybe $NZ550 locally. I'd normally not buy a phone for more than $200 locally, if that (my current phone cost me $19 new, works well as a phone, and is hard to use for anything else. Which is fine). Some Huawei's are sold here by retailers - relatively few models. Xiaomis seem to be only on the local auction site with Chinese sourcing. Claimed-functionality/price I'd lean towards a Xiaomi. Note - the aim is not to be convinced that I don't NEED this spec - I know that :-). Claimed warranty from Ali-Express sellers is often 1 year BUT I'd assume that if it failed within a year that a successful warranty claim would be an unlikely bonus. Russell --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .