Optical was originally the starting point, but there were concerns such=20
as detecting the target when there are other items on the field, and=20
bright sunlight etc affecting the cameras.

Cheers,
-Neil.


On 10/7/2019 3:00 PM, Gordon Williams wrote:
> Have you thought about doing it optically?  A few cameras around the
> field, your object painted in a unique colour and some simple computer
> vision programming.  Have a look at opencv.
>
> Gordon Williams
>
>
> On 2019-10-07 2:04 p.m., Neil wrote:
>> THIS is what I'm concerned about, and know little about.  But it's a
>> mostly open field, so hoping there's minimal of that.  Also considering
>> that if I add one or two more receivers, that perhaps the code can
>> figure out which signal is unrealistic and eliminate that from the
>> calculation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Neil.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/7/2019 11:59 AM, David Van Horn wrote:
>>> Reflections and multipath will drive you nuts.
>>>
>>> --
>>> David VanHorn
>>> Lead Hardware Engineer
>>>
>>> Backcountry Access, Inc.
>>> 2820 Wilderness Pl, Unit H
>>> Boulder, CO  80301 USA
>>> phone: 303-417-1345  x110
>>> email: david.vanhorn@backcountryaccess.com
>>>
>>>

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.