I've received it three times, so my guess is you are not receiving it,
but others are.

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 06:50:50PM -0300, Isaac Marino Bavaresco wrote:
> Three times I tried to post the message below as a new thread. It seems
> that the list doesn't accept original messages from me, just replies.
>=20
> >> Start of message
>=20
> [PIC] More code (trying to send third time)
>=20
> Dear all,
>=20
> Some more routines, this time for iButton/1-Wire.
>=20
> I'm really fond of the function 'OneWireSearch', which is reentrant (for
> architectures that support reentrancy) and much more elegant than the
> Dallas/Maxim reference code and all others that I have seen .
>=20
> Sorry Bob, comments are sparse.
>=20
> Link: <http://www.piclist.com/Techref/member/IMB-yahoo-J86/onewire.htm>
>=20
> Cheers,
> Isaac
>=20
> >> End of message
>=20
>=20
> Em 19/08/2019 18:27, Isaac M. Bavaresco escreveu:
> > Dear Michael,
> >
> > My opinion is that nowadays there is very little need and reasons to
> > program in assembly. A few small blocks of inline assembly to replace
> > code that the compiler generates too poorly, OK. One or two small
> > modules entirely in assembly to implement timing-critical routines
> > like delays, OK too.
> >
> > I would not write assembly code to overcome insufficient speed of the
> > MCU. I simply would choose a more modern and faster part.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Isaac
> >
> > Em seg, 19 de ago de 2019 17:39, Michael Johnston
> > <michaelwjohnston1@gmail.com <mailto:michaelwjohnston1@gmail.com>>
> > escreveu:
> >
> >     Hi all, do you consider writing assembler routines for the
> >     PIC16Fxxx parts
> >     out of date? I am trying to learn XC8 and MicroC for this family. I
> >     understand most of the issues when writing code in assembler and
> >     Ive so
> >     basic stuff in XC8 which seems to work all right for me!
> >     Thank You
> >     Michael Johnston
> >
> >     On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:13 AM Bob Blick <bobblick@outlook.com
> >     <mailto:bobblick@outlook.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > Thank you Isaac, I have great respect for your code and this is w=
ell
> >     > commented. I have some HX711 boards and load cells that I was
> >     playing with
> >     > a few years back. This is a good excuse to pull them back up to
> >     the surface
> >     > and finally build a cat feeder that dispenses accurately based
> >     on weight.
> >     >
> >     > Friendly regards, Bob
> >     >
> >     > ________________________________________
> >     > From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu <mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu>
> >     <piclist-bounces@mit.edu <mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu>> on
> >     behalf of
> >     > Isaac Marino Bavaresco
> >     > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 6:27 AM
> >     > To: piclist@mit.edu <mailto:piclist@mit.edu>
> >     > Subject: [PIC] HX711 routines
> >     >
> >     > Dear All,
> >     >
> >     > I just published some routine to interface with the 24-bit
> >     sigma-delta
> >     > ADC HX711:
> >     >
> >     > <http://www.piclist.com/Techref/member/IMB-yahoo-J86/HX711.htm>
> >     >
> >     > Cheers,
> >     >
> >     > Isaac
> >     >
> >     > --
> >     > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> >     > View/change your membership options at
> >     > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >     >
> >     --=20
> >     http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> >     View/change your membership options at
> >     http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >
>=20
>=20
> ---
> Este email foi escaneado pelo Avast antiv=EDrus.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> --=20
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.