Hi,

Looking at a transformer, primary 12T secondary 200T, step-up

The primary is split in two, the secondary in 3, to reduce leakage inductan=
ce.

ie,
1. L1. Secondary  50T
2. L2. Primary  6T
3. L3. Secondary  50T
4. L4. Secondary  50T
5. L5. Primary  6T
6. L6. Secondary 50T


L1 and L3 (secondary) are at opposite sides of the secondary.

In which case isn't the direction of the flux changing ?
So, when L1 is wound clockwise, shouldn't L3 be wound in a
counter-clockwise fashion ?

Am I thinking right, or thoughts in the wrong direction ?

Apart from the original questions, any thoughts on a better
methodology to reduce leakage inductance ?

Any thoughts ?

Thanks,
Manu
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.