>
> Interesting.
> I've had good results over decades with ionisation type detectors and hav=
e
> found photoelectric ones less sensitive than I'd like.
>
> I had intended to do an informal test of various detectors and locations
> "sometime" / manana  (manana manana?) .
>

I don't know what kind of smoke detectors we have. but they definitely
work since they trip pretty often when cooking. That's our "periodic
test."

Harold


--=20
FCC Rules Updated Daily at http://www.hallikainen.com
Not sent from an iPhone.
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.