Hi Russell,

Yes, I published it on 2015/10/28, but it seems that by then people
wasn't much interested anymore, nobody did comment.

Original post quoted below.

Cheers,

Isaac


> Dear All,
>
>
> We received 19 answers to the poll from 17 different people. For
> statistical purposes I considered only 17 unique answers.
> Results below.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Isaac
>
>
>
> Boards
>
> 88.2% (15) design their own boards
> 17,6% (3) etch their own boards, while other 23.5% (4) do it sometimes
> 82.4% (14) assemble their own boards
>
> MCU
>
> PIC10/12/16/18           88.2% (15)
> PIC32                    41.2%  (7)
> ARM(Atmel, STM)          41.2%  (7)
> dsPIC/PIC24              35.3%  (6)
> AVR(including Arduino)   29.4%  (5)
> 8051                      5.9%  (1)
> Other                    11.8%  (2)
>
> 100% (17) use 8-bit MCUs. 17.6% (3) use use both PICs and other vendors
> and 11.8% (2) use exclusively non-Microchip MCUs.
> Only 35.3% (6) use 16-bit PIC24 and dsPIC
> 76.5% (13) use 32-bit MCUs. 29.4% (5) use exclusively ARM, 29.4% (5) use
> exclusively PIC32, while 17.6% (3) use both.
> It seems that of the AVR users, just one does not use Arduino.
>
>
> Language
>
> C/C++                   70.6% (12)
> Assembly                70.6% (12)
> Pascal                  29.4%  (5)
> JAL                     11.8%  (2)
> Basic                    5.9%  (1)
>
> All of the JAL programmers also use C and Pascal.
> 17.6% (3) program exclusively in Assembly.
>
>
> Compilers
>
> MPASM                           47.1% (8)
> GCC(XC16/XC32/ARMGCC/Arduino)   41.2% (7)
> MPLAB C (XC8, C18, C30, C32)    41.2% (7)
> SDCC                            17.6% (3)
> MikroEletronica                 17.6% (3)
> JAL                             11.8% (2)
> WizC                             5.9% (1)
> AVRAsm                           5.9% (1)
>
>
>
>
> IDE
>
> MPLAB IDE                41.2% (7)
> MPLAB X                  41.2% (7)
> Text editor              29.4% (5) (gVim, Notepad++, Notepad2, UltraEdit)
> Arduino                  23.5% (4)
> MikroEletronica          11.8% (2)
> CoIDE                    11.8% (2)
> Other                    23.5% (4) (Atmel Studio, Piklab, Total
> Commander, Energia IDE )
>
> 11.8% (2) do not use any IDE, just a text editor.
>
>
> Tools
>
> Programmer/Debugger
> PICKIT3                 47.1% (8)
> ICD3                    41.2% (7)
> PICKIT2                 29.4% (5)
> ICD2                     5.9% (1)
>
>
> Inspection/Measurement
> Logic Analyzer          41.2% (7)
> Oscilloscope            17.6% (3)
> Other                   41.2% (7) (J-Link/SAM-ICE, Real ICE, PICProg,
> LEDs, LCD, etc.)
>
>
> Software Framework
>
> None                    64,7% (11)
> MAL                     17.6%  (3)
> ASF (Atmel ARM)         11.8%  (2)
> MikroEletronica         11.8%  (2)
> MPLAB Harmony            5.9%  (1)
> RTOS                     5.9%  (1)
> Homebrew                11.8%  (2)
>
> It seems that MPLAB Harmony is not taking off.
>
>
> Pro/Amateur
>
> 52.9% (9) declare themselves as professionals, while 2/3 of them (6)
> declare as hobbyists as well.
> 17.6% (3) declare as hobbyists while 29.4% (5) did not answer.


Em 23/02/2018 19:37, RussellMc escreveu:
> Isaac - did a compilation happen?
> If so can you provide a link or other reference
>
>  Russell
>
>
> On 7 October 2015 at 23:40, Isaac Marino Bavaresco <
> isaacbavaresco@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Trevor!
>>
>> I think we will not have many more participants from now on, so this
>> weekend I will compile the data and will the results.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Isaac
>>
>>

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.