Some hobby projects can be so publically visible that a manufacturer
will provide support anyway.  ;-)

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:03:56PM -0500, Sean Breheny wrote:
> Thanks James and all those who responded. I will look to see if there is
> any documentation available from ARM themselves. This is only a hobby
> project so I have no leverage to get additional support from the
> manufacturer.
>=20
> On Dec 13, 2017 3:31 PM, "James Cameron" <quozl@laptop.org> wrote:
>=20
> > Yes, Sean, I've seen the same kind of documentation problems when
> > using MK20DX256 and the related processors to bring up C Forth.
> >
> > However, I've been a documentation writer, had used Marvell ARM
> > documentation for a few years, and was very used to different styles.
> >
> > By far the biggest annoyance when compared to PIC is that the imported
> > IP isn't documented by the vendor, so one has to go to ARM for that.
> >
> > For large enough quantities, I'd engage with the vendor.  That's what
> > we (at OLPC) did with Marvell and we got some good clarifications or
> > documentation updates out of it.
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > --
> > http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> > View/change your membership options at
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >
> --=20
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--=20
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.