>=20 > On Oct 18, 2017, at 7:44 PM, RussellMc wrote: > My understanding is that the hard Science [tm] understanding on nutrition= al > matters is that the high carb, low fat aims of recent decades was a poor= ly > founded and invalid way of eating. Bad fats have become gooder. Some rece= nt There's substantial evidence that the official nutritional recommendations = were motivated by a combination of politics/lobbying/money. Which may make = further discussion of their origin taboo here. I defer to the mods' opinion= s on this :) Regardless of their origin, if you plot the increase in heart disease, type= 2 diabetes, etc vs the implementation of these recommendations, you get a = very good fit. Chris Smolinski Black Cat Systems http://www.blackcatsystems.com --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .