On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, David C Brown wrote:

> Perhaps I have been selling myself short !  Whist I thank you for your
> suggestions at the risk of sounding sarcastic which is not my intent, the=
re
> is nothing there that I couldn't get from my 1967 university textbook..  =
Or
> from experienced engineers in my first job at International  Computers Lt=
d
> in 1969.
>
> The basic non restoring algorithm must have been developed by Turing or
> Wilkes or one of there contemporaries back in the fifties.   For interest=
,
> or not, This my take on it. - 55 memories, 2 working registers,  worst ca=
se
> 156 instructions.  Please criticise to your hearts content

Next time how about you cut straight to the chase, present your code and=20
say something like "hey does anybody know how to do division better than=20
this".

And here's a tip for you, if you think you might be sounding sarcastic=20
(and in this case it comes across in spades) then just do yourself a=20
favour and leave the comment out.

BTW "there contemporaries" should be "their contemporaries"

Regards
Sergio Masci
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.