Hi James - I am pleased you have a working solution . It would be good to r=
eally understand what happened in the first versions though.

Stephen


-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of=
 James Wages
Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 6:20 PM
To: piclist@mit.edu
Subject: RE: [PIC] PIC16F18854 PORTB Read problem

Stephen,

I resolved it in the Microchip forum here:

http://www.microchip.com/forums/m/tm.aspx?m=3D1011143

James Wages

> On Aug 31, 2017, at 1:00 AM, piclist-request@mit.edu wrote:
>=20
> Hi James -
>=20
> When you say it is misread, do you mean that it is always HI or always LO=
?
> Also, are you sure about your individual tests? It seems you are reversin=
g the bit order- RB0 =3D> RAMa,7 etc... Hence RB5 will be in RAMa,2, not RA=
Ma,5 as might be expected.
>=20
> Stephen
>=20
> -----
--
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/chang=
e your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclis=
t

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.