> Am I the only person who sometimes uses absolute code and
> prefers to Quickbuild my programs rather than build a project?

Hi Bob,

I still basically use assembly, absolute code, 16F, 18F, MPLAB 8.56,
PIC Start Plus

24F and dsPIC33 too, with Olin's programmers rather than PS+

Don't use C or anything other than assembly, never have, probably
never will

I have enough on-going and planned projects to keep me occupied
for a long time.

Here's one current project that's a lot of fun. It's an analogue synth
that I started too long ago and am now re-building, including PICs
for both the quasi-analogue and digital (triggers etc) side. The true
analogue circuitry (eg VCOs) is very "organic" and reactive, the
PICs much more suitable for general smarts between modules that
would be difficult or tedious to do discretely

Maybe 1/2 way through, picture on left is but a small part of the
overall build (won't be as big as Tonto but it's still pretty flexible).
Plenty of boards to go to fill up those empty spaces

https://www.flickr.com/photos/97814409@N04/albums/72157671619263690

Mostly 16F88 and 18F14K22, doesn't really need anything bigger.
PIC-based sequencers, keyboard interfaces, MIDI drums etc. The
LFO is a typical mix of PIC digital-analogue. A DAC is used to
create waveforms and envelopes from tables, as in the other two
pictures. Other similar modules include the ADSRs and random
generator

I've also made memory and delay boards using dsPICs, largely
because of their DMA and ADC/DAC modules

All in assembler

Joe


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12856 - Release Date: 08/22/16

--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.