On 7 Aug 2016 at 1:20, RussellMc wrote: > LORA offers about -146 dBm receive level (BER =3D?) > For a link budget of around 165 dB. > A decent dish on the RX (not 'of course' on the TX) would nicely increase > that. >=20 > ____________________________ >=20 > Bob mentioned >=20 > *Microchip has LoRa modules that already have FCC and IC modular approval= , > RN2903 for the 915 MHz version.* > *About $15 each in singles.* > *________* >=20 > US: FCC ID: T9JRN2903 > Canadian: Contains transmitter module IC: 6514A-RN2903. >=20 > He forgot to mention Australia & NZ certification as well :-).=20 > Sadly, NZ & Australian final certification still requires some hoop jumpi= ng > - but far less so than if starting from scratch. >=20 > At 1st glance these seem to be better, cheaper & slightly faster, choose > any 3, than any opposition. >=20 > That said, see AliExpress offerings at end. >=20 > Even Microchip are not immune to a comment which is liable to make > regulatory authorities nervous. > " Up to 15 km coverage at suburban and up to 5 km coverage at urban area" > That would have to be with <=3D 375 mW DC in and a 6.5 dBi 'sleeve dipole= ' at > each end. >=20 > These look very good value > I=B2C, SPI, UART interfaces included. Seems like just UART according to the RN2903/RN2483 datasheets, but perhaps= =20 the other interfaces are on their to-do list. Sidetracking from the origina= l post but=20 LoRa looks cool. The RN2903 is 915MHz, and the RN2483 is dual freq/dual=20 antenna 433 and 868MHz.=20 I spoke to a company called kotahi.net at the new Zealand Agricultural Fie= ldays.=20 They're rolling out a LoRaWAN network on 868MHz here. Apparently 9 access=20 points up and running now already covering 50% of the population. Very much= =20 cheaper than cellular. There are similar providers in other countries, and/= or I believe=20 you can roll-your-own LoRaWAN network with a base-station/hub/server thingy= .. I've=20 got a Microchip DM164138 (uses the RN2483 module) on the way to play with. HopeRF also do some well priced LoRa modules (RFM95/96/97/98), though I get= =20 the impression the LoRaWAN satck is not implemented on module like it is in= the=20 Microchip ones. Similar but different is SigFox, also coming soon to Australia/NZ (thinxtra= ..com). --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .