Lindy Mayfield wrote:
> I once had a look at some data that came from some machine that was used =
for in vitro analysis of cells.
>=20
> The data format seemed a bit funny.  There were some rows, but many colum=
ns.  IIRC, the length of time the monitoring was done determined the number=
 of columns, and the number of rows corresponded I think to the input chann=
els.
>=20
> My question is this.  Is this very common thing to see?  How likely are w=
e in today's world now that we are starting to look at data and start to pr=
ocess it to see data that looks like this?  I wouldn't blink an eye at a ta=
ble with 100 million rows, but a table with 100 rows and 100 million column=
s might confuse me.

I know nothing about the subject but that is the sort of format I would=20
prefer if I wanted to generate some waveforms.
Maybe like this site:-=20
https://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/doc/tutorial/T13_invitro_analysis_overview.ht=
m

George Smith
--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.