There are plenty of options. The best (i.e. better supported) free ones in my experience are Mercurial and Git. You can run them locally, no need for remote hosted server, just run a local Linux server or a NAS like Synology and can securely host your repositories locally. Avoid Subversion IMHO. If your crew is not used to source control, the major difficulties will com= e from setting up simple yet mandatory procedures everyone have to follow, th= e technical aspects will be less challenging. Best Regards, ---- Ariel Rocholl http://www.rf-explorer.com -----Original Message----- From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Denny Esterline Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 21:12 To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public. Subject: [EE] Version control suggestions It looks like we're going to do a company-wide IT overhaul early next year as part of a move to a new facility. I'm currently in the planning stages. There's a part of me that thinks this might be an opportunity to bring a "real" version control tool in and I'm looking for recommendations. Smallish group, about 10 people total, half that is actually doing software work. The rest are doing mechanical and electrical design, board layout, build procedures, etc. I'd like to put that under version control as well, if possible. Historically, the ownership has been a bit paranoid where control of IP has been concerned, so internet-hosted solutions are a non-starter. Our current infrastructure is all Windows based and part of the pain of thi= s "upgrade is the forced change to Windows 10 (all other versions stop being sold in October) So I need something that will run on Windows 10. Any suggestions? -Denny -- http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/chang= e your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist --=20 http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist .