On 10/21/2015 7:07 PM, Brent Brown wrote:
> On 21 Oct 2015 at 0:16, Neil wrote:
>
>> But one of the biggest pluses is that Harmony seems to be quite well
>> documented.  I took a while, but once I reached around page 122 IIRC (of
>> an 8000+ page doc), I had a working blinking LED (using Harmony)! :)
> Searching the 8000 page PDF is painfully slow though (minutes).
No kidding!

>> ...
>>
>> Anyway, I really chose this path because my PIC 32 app will need a
>> graphic LCD (prob ST7735 or ILI9341) and I would like to use a library
>> this time.  But I'm not sure if Harmony supports those controllers, as
>> I've just started reading the section on the graphics library and not
>> yet seen anything about the different controllers it supports.
> The ILI9341 is there, we used it in the graphics labs. See my other post.
Actually, I found out that my Harmony (latest v1.06) does not have=20
ILI9341 support.  I suspect it was probably added in for your class.
I have since however got an ILI9341 working with my own code, using the=20
pseudo-code examples on Newhaven's website.  Was pretty straightforward.

>
>> So just curious what anyone's thoughts are with this and if I should
>> U-turn now, or stick with it...?
> Don't know. I'm faced with the same decision over the coming months.
So far I'm still with it, because I would like to take advantage of=20
other Harmony libraries later.

Cheers,
-Neil.


--=20
http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
.